Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Issue
54 Implications around applying a minimum of £10 per hour to staff on Council contracts PDF 601 KB
Minutes:
Matter for Decision
The Officer’s report provided an assessment of the
implications of requiring the Council’s contractors to pay staff who qualify
for the Living Wage an increased rate of £10 per hour. The report was presented
for information only and any decision would need to be considered as part of
the Council’s budget setting process.
Decision of the Executive Councillor for Finance and
Resources
i.
Noted the findings of the
report regarding the implications of requiring contractors to pay qualifying
staff a minimum of £10 per hour when working on Council contracts.
Reason for the Decision
As set out in the Officer’s report.
Any Alternative Options Considered and Rejected
Not applicable.
Scrutiny Considerations
The Committee received a report from the Equality and Anti-Poverty Officer.
The Committee made the following comments in response to the report:
i.
Sought clarification on whether costs provided by
the suppliers took into account costs associated with uprating staff wages
related to maintaining company pay structures.
ii.
Asked where there were issues of recruitment and
retention of staff in low paid positions undertaking work for the Council.
The Equality and Anti-Poverty Officer said the following in response to
Members’ questions:
i. Uplifting wages of the lowest paid could, in many instances, have an
impact on pay differentials suppliers have put in place. The gap between the
Living Wage rate of £8.75 and the £10 rate would mean a high percentage of
supervisor rates (and potentially pay scales up the chain) would need to
increase as well. Some, but not all, of the figures provided by contractors
included the potential costs of uprating wages of staff paid over £10 per hour
in order to keep pay differentials for roles with different levels of
responsibility. In most cases suppliers did not provide information as to how
they arrived at the cost they shared, which meant we could not identify the
proportion of estimated costs that would go towards uprating wages of those
paid over £10 per hour.
ii. Two of the five suppliers also felt that paying the £10 rate would help
with the recruitment and retention of staff.
The Chief Executive said the following in response to Members’
questions:
i.
Apart from those contractors who provided responses
to the Equality and Anti-Poverty Officer, the Council experienced recruitment
and retention issues with specialist staff where there was competition with
roles in the private sector.
The Committee unanimously resolved to endorse the recommendations.
The Executive Councillor noted the recommendations.
Conflicts of Interest Declared by the Executive
Councillor (and any Dispensations Granted)
No conflicts of interest
were declared by the Executive Councillor.