Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Issue
5 2017/18 Revenue and Capital Outturn, Carry Forwards and Significant Variances - ES&C PDF 517 KB
Minutes:
Matter for
Decision
The Officer’s report presented for the Environmental Services and City
Centre Portfolio:
i.
A summary of actual income and expenditure compared
to the final budget for 2017/18 (outturn position).
ii.
Revenue and capital budget variances with explanations.
iii.
Specific requests to carry forward funding
available from budget underspends into 2018/19.
Decision
of Executive Councillor for Environmental Services
and City Centre
Approved carry forward requests:
i.
Totalling £33,330 revenue funding from 2017/18 to
2018/19, as detailed in Appendix C of
the Officer’s report.
ii.
Carry forward requests of £1,065k capital resources
from 2017/18 to 2018/19 to fund rephased net capital
spending, as detailed in Appendix D of
the Officer’s report.
Reason for the Decision
As set out in the Officer’s report.
Any Alternative Options Considered and Rejected
Not applicable.
Scrutiny
Considerations
The Committee received a report from the Principal Accountant
(Services).
In response to Councilor Smart’s question the
Principal Accountant (Services) said that funding was listed under ‘rephased spend’ in Appendix D (P26) of the Officer’s report
as matters sometimes stopped projects being delivered on time eg provision of vehicles by manufacturers. There were good
reasons why carry forwards occurred.
Councillor Gillespie expressed regret that diesel refuse vehicles had
been purchased instead of electric ones. The Executive Councillor said electric
vehicles were desirable (in principle) but untested and double the price of
diesel ones. The Council did not have the funds to purchase electric vehicles.
It had offered to test an electric vehicle (new to the market) on behalf of the
manufacturer.
The Committee unanimously resolved to endorse the recommendations.
The Executive Councillor
approved the recommendations.
Conflicts of Interest Declared by the Executive Councillor
(and any Dispensations Granted)
No conflicts of interest
were declared by the Executive Councillor.