Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Issue
24 Cambridge Northern Fringe East PDF 1 MB
Minutes:
Matter for
Decision
The report was intended to
update the Executive Councillor and the Committee on
the current status and proposals for the Cambridge Northern Fringe East site
and to recommend next steps.
Decision
of Executive Councillor for Strategy and
Transformation
i. To note the
current status, indicative proposals and target timescales for the programme
and the continued engagement with Homes England on progression with the HIF
bid.
ii. Approved the
timeline for the Master Developer tender process and delegate the final
approval to the Strategic Director, in consultation with the Executive
Councillor and Opposition Spokesperson, noting that the decision to run a
procurement in order to identify a
master developer, was in consultation with the Leader, recognising that the
offer was not certain at point of tender.
iii. To establish
the terms for an appropriate joint venture vehicle, working with the Strategic
Director, Anglian Water and advisers, subject to HIF bid outcome.
iv. Noted the
proposed timetable for preparing the CNFE Area Action Plan for the proposed
wider boundary area (contained in paragraph 4.2.6 and appendix 2a), which is
programmed to run in tandem with the HIF bid and with the subsequent regulatory process required for
relocation of the Cambridge Water Recycling Centre.
Reason for the Decision
As set out in the Officer’s report.
Any Alternative Options Considered and Rejected
Not applicable.
Scrutiny
Considerations
The Committee received a report from the Strategic Director.
The Committee made the following comments in response to the report:
i.
Questioned whether 7600 homes would be able to be
built and delivered on the site.
ii.
Requested that Opposition Councillors were included
to develop the Area Action Plans.
iii.
Questioned where the water treatment plant would
relocate to if the Housing Infrastructure Fund (HIF) bid was successful.
The Strategic Director and the Group Property Director from Anglian
Water said the following in response to Members’ questions:
i.
The HIF bid put forward a proposal of 5000 houses
on the core site which was owned partly by Anglian Water and partly by the City
Council but it was hoped that if the core site got approval that this would be
a catalyst to build further housing.
Anglian Water and the City Council did not own land beyond the core site
and therefore the housing figures above 5000 houses were speculative figures.
ii.
Confirmed that if the HIF bid was successful then
officers planned to do more work and involve Opposition Councillors.
iii.
Confirmed that if the HIF bid was successful
Anglian Water would have to go through a process to look for alternative sites
to relocate to.
The Committee unanimously resolved to endorse the recommendations.
The Executive Councillor approved the recommendations.
Conflicts of Interest Declared by the Executive Councillor
(and any Dispensations Granted)
No conflicts of interest
were declared by the Executive Councillor.