Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Issue
57 Policing and Safer Neighbourhoods PDF 178 KB
Minutes:
The Committee
received a report from the Safer Neighbourhoods Inspector, Police Sargeant and Safer Communities Manager regarding policing
and safer neighbourhoods trends.
The report
outlined actions taken since the last reporting period. The current emerging
issues/neighbourhood trends for each ward were also highlighted (see report for
full details). Previous priorities and engagement activity noted in the report
were:
i.
Criminality
in and around East Chesterton
ii.
County line drug dealing.
iii.
To continue to recognise the need for Akeman Street
and Darwin Drive area to receive special police focus.
Members of the public asked a number of
questions, as set out below.
1.
Mr Dunn commented that Ofo had banned parking their bikes in large parts of
Chesterton and King’s Hedges. He asked whether there were any statistics for
the theft of Ofo bikes or any means to encourage Ofo to reconsider this.
Inspector Rogerson commented that Ofo had
not discussed their business model with the Police but there must be a
threshold when they would report stolen bikes. Their business model impacted on
how the Police could help them. It was an interesting question as to when an Ofo bike became ‘stolen’.
2. Mr Bond commented that Ofo would need to provide clarity,
he had seen deliberate vandalism of an Ofo bike as
one had a saddle removed.
3. Clare King made reference to
Fen Road Steering Group notes from 2012 and the same issues were still being
raised. £400,000 had been spent on a good cycle scheme but did not address the
issue. These were issues regarding the Abbey – East Chesterton bridge which had 2000 journeys a day. The County Council were not undertaking a risk assessment. It was an important
issue in East Chesterton which had been raised at Local Liaison Forums. Would
expect the Police and Crime Commissioner and Cllr Herbert to be having
discussions regarding a longer term solution.
4. Mr Taylor raised the issue of
dangerous dogs in Fen Road and Water Street areas. He asked for clarity on the
Council versus the Police role in dealing with dangerous dogs. He commented
that he valued the North Area Committee and referred to a private meeting which
had been arranged with the Police, Cllr Bird and East Chesterton residents, he
noted that these meetings were not minuted and
queried if a special meeting of the North Area Committee could have been
arranged.
Inspector Rogerson
commented that the Police could call their own meetings.
Councillor Bird
commented that the meeting was held with East Chesterton residents as it was a
specific issue relating to them.
5.
Mr Taylor commented that he wanted to take an
active part in the May 2018 local election but felt that he couldn’t as it was
claimed by an election candidate that he was harassing them.
Councillor Manning commented that the
election candidate did not respond to Mr Taylor on twitter. Mr Taylor then asked him why the election
candidate was not responding. He commented that it took a lot to be a councillor.
A lot of the work done by Mr Taylor was extremely valuable this was a single
case where a person did not reply.
6.
Mr Bond commented
that he had used the new police website and found it easy to use. There had
also been a follow up to provide advice about the victim support unit.
In response to Members questions Inspector
Rogerson and Sergeant Williams responded:
i.
The proposal to de-prioritise special police focus
for Akeman Street and Darwin Drive did not mean that the Police would
completely withdraw from the area. Following the convictions of certain
individuals the number of matters reported to the police regarding the Akeman
Street and Darwin Drive area had decreased.
ii.
Police Officers and PCSOs will go out into the
community and will target certain areas as a result of hot spot calls.
iii.
He asked Members to liaise with the police
regarding issues raised by residents and commented that councillors should not
have to wait until a North Area committee to raise them.
iv.
29 individual had been arrested with intent to
supply, there had been an arrest the morning of the area committee meeting of
an individual who had a large amount of class A drugs.
v.
Asked if members of the public had intelligence
regarding drug dealing that people emailed the police so that it could be
followed up, members of the public could email in anonymously.
vi.
With reference to an issue raised in West
Chesterton about dangerous driving, the police required more details than just
the colour of the car. If it was
possible to provide details of the make or model and the time of day then
officers could be sent in either marked or unmarked cars to follow up.
In response to comments by the Committee the Police and Crime
Commissioner made the following points:
i.
He was
pleased with the feedback that had been given about the work that had been done
on Fen Road.
ii.
He was
happy to meet with Councillor Herbert to look at what could be done as a long
term solution about the Abbey East Chesterton bridge?
iii.
On the
County line issue, drug dealers came out of London and targeted the most vulnerable
people.
iv.
When the
police asked for intelligence on drug activity they needed to hear about it
from the public, this information would be used to build up a picture to ensure
that people further up the chain were convicted.
v.
Drug
taking was the issue; whilst there was a demand for drugs there would always be
drug dealers.
vi.
Petty
crime was drug related.
Action: The Safer Communities Manager to liaise with the
Police to produce a clear protocol regarding the Council and Police powers with
dangerous dogs.
The Committee were asked to nominate their local issues for focus over
the coming months.
The following local
issues were agreed (unanimously):
1. Criminality in
and around East Chesterton.
2. County line drug dealing.
3. Summer and hot weather ASB in green and open spaces.