Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Issue
7 PP&T Portfolio Revenue and Capital Budget Proposals for 2018/19 to 2022/23 PDF 643 KB
Minutes:
Matter for Decision
The report detailed the budget proposals relating to the
Planning Policy and Transport portfolio that were included in the
Budget-Setting Report (BSR) 2018/19.
Decision of Executive
Councillor for Planning Policy and Transport
Review of Charges:
i. Approved
the proposed charges for this portfolio’s services and facilities, as shown in
Appendix A of the Officer’s report.
Revenue:
ii. Noted the
revenue budget proposals as shown in Appendix B of the Officer’s report.
Capital:
iii. Noted that
there are no capital bids or savings presented for this portfolio.
Reason for the
Decision
As set out in the Officer’s report.
Any Alternative Options Considered and Rejected
Not applicable.
Scrutiny
Considerations
The Committee received a report from the Principal
Accountant (Services).
Councillor Bick noted the increase in parking fees as a ‘step
in the right direction’ and questioned what had prompted the change which
recognised a broader car park strategy (last year there was a reduction in
charges).
The Executive Councillor stated a good working relationship
had been established with Cambridgeshire County Council and Greater Cambridge
Partnership looking at transport issues in and around the City including ways
to reduce congestion; such as the County’s proposed removal of parking charges
at the park and ride sites. It was hoped that the change in parking fees would
encourage a proportion of drivers to change their habits and use the park and
ride sites or the bus network. This would be monitored over the year to see if
there had been a change.
The Committee endorsed the recommendations by 5 votes to 0.
The Executive Councillor approved the recommendations.
Conflicts of Interest
Declared by the Executive Councillor (and any Dispensations Granted)
No conflicts of interest were declared by the Executive
Councillor