Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Issue
101 Annual Monitoring Report 2017 PDF 381 KB
Additional documents:
Minutes:
Matter for
Decision
The Council is required to produce an Annual Monitoring Report (AMR) on
at least a yearly basis.
The draft AMR was attached as report Appendix A (on the agenda) for
agreement.
Decision
of Executive Councillor for Planning Policy and Transport
i.
Agreed the content of the AMR
(Appendix A of the Officer’s report), subject to inclusion of amendments
discussed at 5 December 2017 DPSSC.
ii.
Agreed that if any amendments are
necessary, these should be agreed by the Executive Councillor for Planning
Policy and Transport in consultation with Chair and Spokes of Development Plan
Scrutiny Sub Committee.
Reason for the Decision
As set out in the Officer’s report.
Any Alternative Options Considered and Rejected
Not applicable.
Scrutiny
Considerations
The Committee received a report from the Senior Planning Policy Officer. The Senior Planning Policy Officer updated
her report by tabling amendments to paragraphs 4.7 and 4.8.
The Committee made the following comments in response to the report:
AMR Chapter 2
i.
Councillors requested the inclusion of lower
quartile pay and lower quartile housing affordability ratios.
AMR Chapter 5
ii.
Asked that paragraph 5.11 and Fig 1 (P50) both
reflected Housing Completions and Projected Completions 1 April 2011 to 31
March 2031 in line with the Local Plan.
The Senior Planning Policy Officer said the following in response to
Members’ questions:
Report Section 3 / AMR Chapter 11
i.
The Council was awaiting comments on affordable housing
thresholds from the Planning Inspector. The thresholds may need to be reviewed
in light of the Inspector’s comments (when available) and future Central
Government recommendations/legislation including changes to affordable
housing definitions.
ii.
Table 23 in Chapter 11 of the AMR set out a series
of Supplementary Planning Documents (SPDs) the Council was putting together to
supplement the Local Plan. The SPDs could be used as a material
consideration in planning decision–making but would not be formally adopted as
SPDs until the Local Plan was adopted. SPD policies would then be reviewed to ensure
they reflected any modifications to the Local Plan.
AMR Chapter 5
iii.
Table C1 (agenda P209) set out 5 year land supply
details and identified sites. The Council was in a comfortable position.
iv.
(Para 5.27) The Planning Inspector had not
confirmed if Cambridge City Council and South Cambridgeshire District Council
needed a combined target to deliver housing. Cambridge City Council and South
Cambridgeshire District Council had a Memorandum of Understanding on the
Greater Cambridge Joint Housing Trajectory to help delivery.
AMR Chapter 8
v.
Para 8.1 referred to “telecommunications” as this
was the terminology used in the current plan (instead of “broadband” etc).
AMR Chapter 9
vi.
The position regarding the Northern Fringe East
Area Action Plan would be reviewed in future once the outcome of the Housing
Infrastructure Commission bid was known. The New Neighbourhoods Team were
aware of the situation and would deal with planning applications taking this
into consideration.
AMR Chapter 11
vii.
Para 11.8 typographical error: Northern Fringe East.
AMR Chapter 12
viii.
Key Facts G4 gave a breakdown of combined owner
occupied/private rent figures outlined in the table in Appendix A – Contextual
Indicators. The most recent figures came from the 2011 census and were expected
to be updated in 2018.
ix.
It may also be possible to include trend
information in the 2018 AMR to show how many owner occupied properties were
becoming private rented ones. Officers would source information from housing
survey information (based on the census) and planning permission data, then
investigate the possibility of including this in future AMRs.
x.
Officers would review if homes in multiple
occupation data could be included in the 2018 AMR.
AMR Appendix A
xi.
Officers would review if comparative data regarding
employment could be included in the 2018 AMR.
The Committee unanimously resolved to endorse the recommendations.
The Executive Councillor approved the recommendations.
Conflicts of Interest Declared by the Executive Councillor (and any
Dispensations Granted)
No conflicts of interest
were declared by the Executive Councillor.