Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Issue
32 Single Equality Scheme PDF 139 KB
Additional documents:
Minutes:
Matter for
Decision
The report provided an update on progress in delivering key actions set
out in the Single Equality Scheme (SES) for 2016/17. It also proposed some new
actions for delivery during 2017/18.
The Council’s SES was originally approved by the Executive Councillor
for Strategy and Transformation at the Strategy and Resources Committee on 13
July 2015. The SES set out how the organisation would challenge discrimination
and promote equal opportunity in all aspects of its work over a three year
period (2015-2018).
Decision
of Executive Councillor for Strategy and
transformation
i.
Noted the progress in delivering equalities actions
during 2016/17.
ii.
Approved the actions proposed in the SES for
delivery during
2017/18.
Reason for the Decision
As set out in the Officer’s report.
Any Alternative Options Considered and Rejected
Not applicable.
Scrutiny
Considerations
The Committee received a report from the Equality and Anti-Poverty Officer.
The Committee made the following comments in response to the report:
i.
Thanked officers for their hard work, the report
highlighted how many services were being delivered by the council.
ii.
Queried what impact the equal access programmes had
made and what they had been used for?
iii.
Asked if the Leader shared the national scepticism
on the Prevent Strategy?
iv.
Praised the work with ethnic minority groups,
continued engagement had made a noticeable improvement in relations between the
communities.
The Equality and Anti-Poverty Officer and Executive Councillor for
Strategy and Transformation said the following in response to Members’
questions:
v.
The equal access programmes had given recipients
lots of new skills. The future plan was to expand these services and ensure
recipients were involved in decision making.
vi.
At present faith groups did not have a structured
community response so undertaking a study to assess the demand for a Council of
Faiths and increase involvement was a priority.
vii.
Confirmed that the Prevent Strategy covered a range
of issues not singularly radicalisation. The programme involved representatives
from a range of backgrounds and had a positive impact in Cambridge. If a
national review of the programme was undertaken the council would happily take
part.
The Committee unanimously resolved to endorse the recommendations.
The Executive Councillor approved the recommendations.