Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Issue
16 Update on Transport Projects in the South Area PDF 251 KB
Minutes:
The Area Committee received a verbal
report from the County Council’s Cycling Projects Team Leader on various
transport projects in the South Area.
1)
Fulbourn Road
a. a City Deal funded scheme
b. detailed design was being finalised
c. work was planned to start in September
d. the scheme consisted of raised/hybrid cycle lanes on both
sides from the Robin Hood to ARM and a wide, shared use path from ARM to Yarrow
Road
e. officers had recently met Cllrs Ashton and Dryden on site
to discuss
f. contact officer Grant.Weller@cambridgeshire.gov.uk
2)
Queen Edith’s Way and Fendon Road roundabout
a. a County Council S106 funded scheme
b. County Council’s Environment and Economy Committee had
resolved on 10th November 2016 to approve:
i. the implementation of a Dutch style roundabout at Queen
Edith’s Way/Mowbray Road/Fendon Road junction; and
ii. further public engagement with residents and stakeholders
on improvements for walking and cycling in Queen Edith’s Way
c. a detailed design for the roundabout was being developed
d. workshops were planned for Queen Edith’s Way
e. the matter would go back to the Economy & Environment
Committee once a design had been developed for Queen Edith’s Way itself
f. contact officer Grant Weller
The County Councillor for Queen Edith’s
welcomed the design work being carried out, and asked when the scheme would be
completed. The Cycling Projects Team
Leader said that this was the UK’s first Dutch-style roundabout, and it was
being developed with a Dutch consultancy firm.
It would be ideal if the Queen Edith’s Way scheme could be approved, so
that the roundabout and the road feeding into and out of it could be of the
same high standard.
3)
Trumpington Road outside the Botanic Gardens
a. funded through Department for Transport (DfT) Cycle City
Ambition
b. works were progressing well
c. the local stakeholder group had met regularly throughout
the scheme
d. upcoming tasks included relocating street lights,
completion of new floating bus stop, and the surfacing and installation of new
raised/hybrid cycle lane.
e. contact officer Stuart.Rushby@cambridgeshire.gov.uk
One of the Councillors for Trumpington
congratulated all responsible for this scheme, which had not suffered from the
same difficulties and lack of information as the Hills Road scheme. He asked why there seemed currently to be a
pause in the work.
The Team Leader said that it had been
possible to keep traffic flowing by removing parking. He thanked the Botanic Gardens for their help
and understanding throughout the work, and for accommodating stakeholder meetings. It would not be possible to lay the final
surface and finish the scheme until work to move street lights had been
completed.
4)
Robin Hood junction
a. an S106 funded scheme
b. being managed by the Traffic Signals Team
c. discussions and design deliberations ongoing around the
exit from Cherry Hinton High Street to ascertain whether this would be a two-lane or a one-lane exit. Cycle lanes
and pedestrian facilities to be incorporated, but would require additional land
d.
Contact officer Richard.Ling@cambridgeshire.gov.uk
One of the Cherry Hinton Councillors
said that he had thought that agreement had already been reached on the
junction, following a site visit in 2016.
The Cycling Projects Team Leader replied that he believed this had been
for a single-lane exit with cycle and pedestrian crossing, which had given rise
to concern at the possible impact on bus journey times. The Traffic Signals team were talking to the
City Open Spaces team to see whether a strip of land could be obtained on the
corner. The member pointed out that this
land was on a green where trees had already been planted; he had thought the
problem could be resolved without the loss of valuable green space. The Team Leader referred members to the link
officer for further information.
5)
Two-way cycling in one-way streets
a. scheme was funded through DfT Cycle City Ambition and
affected Trumpington
b. Cambridge City Joint Area Committee (CJAC) on 24th
January 2017 had resolved:
i. to support the advertising of Traffic Regulation Orders
(TROs) in order to allow two-way cycling on the following streets:
- Coronation
Street (west of junction with Panton Street)
- Norwich
Street
- Union
Road
- Brookside
ii. to agree not to progress any changes to the following
streets:
- Panton
Street
- St
Eligius Street
c. the next step would be to advertise the TROs and take any
objections back to CJAC
d. contact officer Clare.Rankin@cambridgeshire.gov.uk
6)
Hills Road/Addenbrooke's
a. a City Deal funded scheme
b. work had started in January; four-way lights were
currently in place
c. reply sent to Chair’s letter following last SAC,
acknowledging that the County Council should have told Cherry Hinton and
Trumpington Councillors about the road closure in advance; Queen Edith’s
Councillors had been informed six days before the SAC
d. proposal for next stage of traffic management was being
finalised, with the objective of developing a solution that minimised impacts
on traffic and residents
i. duration would be less than five months, starting in
early June
ii. engagement had been taking place with bus operators, the
ambulance service, and other stakeholders, including a stakeholder group which
had met recently and would continue to meet through the works
iii. all SAC Councillors would be contacted shortly, once the
plans had been finalised
e. contact officer Grant Weller
Members drew attention to problems
which had been experiences with the reliability of the lights on this
scheme. The Cycling Projects Team Leader
said that, because the lights were radio controlled, the cause was believed to
be connected with Addenbrooke's. The
problem was occurring in the evenings, and a hard-wired solution was being
sought.
Members welcomed the reduction of time
to complete the work, and sought assurance that it would not last 24/7, and
would not affect both directions at once.
The Team Leader said that a solution was being sought in consultation
with the traffic signals team and the bus companies, and would be announced
once plans had been finalised.
Wendy Blythe said that the planting at
bus stops on Hills Road had been very well received, and asked whether
something similar might be possible on Trumpington Road. The Team Leader said that contact had been
made with the guerrilla groundsman who had planted up some of the area near the
Botanic Gardens with a view to developing green ends to the bus stops.
7)
Cherry Hinton Road
a. an S106 funded scheme
b. seeking to improve the length from Hills Road to Perne
Road for walking and cycling. There was some funding for the Perne Road/Cherry
Hinton Road roundabout
c. initial surveys of traffic and parking had been
undertaken
d. stakeholder workshops would be taking place
e. public consultation was planned for September
f. contact officer Stuart Rushby.
8)
Greenways
a. City Deal funded, though also potential for S106 funding
b. 12 new or improved direct, attractive routes linking
South Cambridgeshire to the city, to encourage more people to commute by bike
c. four of the routes run through South Area
d. funding has been allocated initially to develop the
schemes
e. ‘Planning for Real’ events were being planned
f. currently prioritising which routes to take forward first
g. contact officer Simon.Manville@cambridgeshire.gov.uk
h. see plan attached as Appendix A for details
In reply to comments on the scheme,
members noted that parking had been lost by putting the building compound on
the road rather than on green space.
There was an approved scheme for the west side of Trumpington Road; the
widening would be into the road, not the common, and there was further scope to
look again at cycling improvements. One
member drew attention to the difficulty experienced by pedestrians in dodging
cyclists on pavements; anything that could be done to improve this would be
much appreciated.
The Chair thanked the Cycling Projects
Team Leader for attending the meeting and for his excellent reporting.