Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Issue
20 Policing and Safer Neighbourhoods PDF 168 KB
Minutes:
The Committee
received a report from Sgt Kevin Misik
regarding
policing and safer neighbourhoods trends.
The report
outlined actions taken since the last reporting period. The current emerging
issues/neighbourhood trends for each ward were also highlighted (see report for
full details). Previous priorities and engagement activity were noted as
detailed in the report.
Members of the public asked a number of
questions, as set out below.
1. Nationally acid and ammonia attacks are attracting
press comment. Is this a problem locally?
Inspector Leadbeater stated that gang culture was spreading and that
gang tactics had been copied locally. There had been incidents of ammonia
attacks in the city in the last six months.
2. At the
recent Midsummer Fair various individuals with police powers were present. Were
these out of county officers appointed
by the Chief Inspector of Cambridgeshire police?
All police
officers attending this event had been approved by the Chief Inspector of
Cambridgeshire police.
3. There
appears to be a large increase in cycle theft. Why isn’t more action being
taken?
The statistics show that there is an increase
in cycle theft. However, current policing prioritises people over property.
The Committee
expressed disappointment that cycle theft was regarded as a low-risk crime and
suggested that this was a crime against young people who could be put at risk
if their only means of transport was stolen.
Councillor
Gillespie stated local residents had complained that drug dealing was taking
place in the street and that this should be a priority for the police.
Councillor Bick
felt that the categories covered by the priorities suggested were too broad and
that more focused approach produced better results. He suggested losing rough
sleeping as a priority was disappointing however partnership working to resolve
the wider problems might produce better results.
Sgt Misik stated that the priorities were necessarily broad and
that this approach would allow the police to add value locally.
Inspector Leadbeater stated that a
number of out of county criminal and drug dealers had been arrested in recent
weeks.
Counselling
Gehring expressed disappointment at the new approach to setting priorities. He
suggested that Area Committees should be allowed to adopt a bottom-up approach
with suggestions coming from the community.
The Committee
discussed the suggested priorities:
1. Street-based anti-social behaviour.
2. Road safety.
3. Youth-related anti-social behaviour.
4. Alcohol-related violence and disorder.
5. Taxi issues.
6. Licensing issues.
Councillor Nethsingha
suggested that based on the Committee’s discussions, priorities 1, 3 and 4
appeared to reflect the Committee’s concerns.
The committee also requested that action be taken
on cycle theft but agreed not to make this a priority.
The following priorities were unanimously agreed:
i.
Street-based
anti-social behaviour.
ii.
Youth-related
anti-social behaviour.
iii. Alcohol-related violence and disorder.