Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Issue
44 Cambridge Live: Where we are and What Next for City Events PDF 313 KB
8:50PM
Cambridge Live
organises Cambridge’s City Events programme on behalf of Cambridge City
Council. Come along and hear their future plans for future outdoor events and
to share your ideas with them too.
Additional documents:
Minutes:
The Committee received a presentation from Sara Garnham, Matt Deacon and Steve Bagnall of Cambridge Live. The presentation covered the history, funding streams, governance structures and the range of events offered by Cambridge Live.
Cambridge Live is a not-for-profit charity that
runs the Cambridge Corn Exchange, Cambridge Folk Festival and also delivers a
range of outdoor events on behalf of Cambridge City Council, including its
annual Big Weekend, Bonfire Night and the Mayor’s Day Out.
Cambridge Live were currently seeking feedback from
local residents were urged to respond to the questionnaire (link below).
https://www.cambridgelivetrust.co.uk/city-events/city-events-survey
The Cambridge Live representatives responded to questions and comments
as follows:
Q1. Councillor
Sargeant: Young people, particularly those in the North of Cambridge, feel that
Cambridge Live events were not for them. How is this being addressed?
A. The Team were aware of the challenges and were seeking to bring some events out to the wider community. Education and participation had grown over the last five years and was a priority for the future.
Q2. Clare King: As an
independent body Cambridge Live was now subject to less scrutiny of its
governance. Board minutes appear to be very brief concerning the serious
accident on Midsummer Common that occurred in November 2015. Subsequent actions
were not reported. If this was discussed, where is the audit trail for the
public to review?
A. Sara Garnham: This would be included in the Annual Report to the City Council’s Community Service Scrutiny Committee. As a private company the Charity was under no obligation to publish it minutes. However, it chooses to publish a shortened form of its discussions. The matter was fully discussed.
Cambridge Live’s AGM was open to the public, and minutes and accounts are available for public scrutiny.
Michael Bond suggested that as a company limited by guarantee with charitable status, Cambridge Live was publically accountable.
Q3. Councillor Smart:
Agreed with Ms King that their needed to be more transparency about the Trust’s
response to a serious incident. Suggested that this should
have been mentioned in the presentation.
A. The the matter could still be the subject of legal proceedings and no more could be said at present.
Q4. Councillor Bird:
Would the disabled children’s session of the Midsummer Fair continue?
A. Yes. This is regarded as important.
Q5. Member of the
Public: Acoustics in the Corn Exchange are poor. Can anything be done to
improve this?
A. Steve Bagnall: Some people love the acoustics and some dislike it. Any improvement would require a significant investment.
Q6. Councillor
Manning: Are there any plans to measure the non-financial success of the Trust
such as health and wellbeing benefits?
A. Sara Garnham: The Trust would widen its partnership working and would be rolling out future programmes with wider social goals.