Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Issue
40 Medium Term Financial Strategy PDF 139 KB
Additional documents:
Minutes:
Recommendation (a) was chaired by Diana Minns (Vice Chair / Tenant
Representative) and recommendation (b) was chaired by Councillor Todd-Jones
Matter for
Decision
The Housing Revenue Account Budget Setting Report, considered and approved in January / February of each year was the long-term strategic planning document for housing landlord services provided by Cambridge City Council.
The Housing Revenue Account (HRA) Medium Term Financial
Strategy provides an opportunity to review the assumptions incorporated as part
of the longer-term financial planning process, recommending any changes in
response to new legislative requirements, variations in external economic
factors and amendments to service delivery methods, allowing incorporation into
budgets and financial forecasts at the earliest opportunity.
Decision
of Executive Councillor for Housing
i.
(Recommendation
2a) Approve the Housing Revenue Account Medium Term Financial Strategy
attached, to include all proposals for change in:
·
Financial
assumptions as detailed in Appendix B of the Officer’s report.
·
2016/17 revenue budgets as introduced in
Section 5, resulting from changes in financial assumptions and the financial
consequences of change, as introduced in Section 5, detailed in Appendix D of
the Officer’s report and summarised in Appendix G.
ii. (Recommendation 2b) Approved proposals for changes in existing housing capital budgets, as introduced in Sections 6 and 7 of the Officer’s report and detailed in Appendix E of the document, with the resulting position summarised in Appendix H, for decision at Council on 20th October 2016.
Reason for the Decision
As set out in the Officer’s report.
Any Alternative Options Considered and Rejected
Not applicable.
Scrutiny
Considerations
The Committee received a report from the Business
Manager/Principal Accountant.
The Committee made the following comments in response to the report:
i.
Sought clarification regarding the expected policy revisions
regarding the sale of high value stock. Officers confirmed that this was not
yet available.
ii.
Expressed concerns that completed, new build
properties had been left empty due to technical difficulties with the
developer.
The Business Manager/Principal Accountant stated the following in
response to Members’ questions:
i.
It was hoped that the, now vacant, South Area
Office would realise the anticipated savings. The property was being actively
marketed but to date a sub-let of the lease had not been agreed.
ii.
Agreed with the Committee that tenants needed to be
keep informed of developments regarding Universal Credit.
iii.
Confirmed the approach being taken regarding annual
valuation of the housing stock.
iv.
It was anticipated that the valuation formulas
would change to reflect the impact of new policies such as: Pay to Stay, fixed
term or short term tenancies.
The Strategic Advisor - Housing and Welfare Reform stated that the
development of Anstey Way was currently delayed. Rent reduction had impacted on
the development programme. It was hoped that devolution funding, which came
with less constraints, would allow this project to be completed. ‘Right to Buy’
receipts could not be used for this project.
In response to questions from the Committee
the Executive Councillor Housing stated the following:
i.
A joint approach with other authorities was being pursued to push for a
deferral of ‘Pay to Stay’ and for an assurance
regarding future administration costs of applying the charges.
ii.
Whilst no firm commitment had been received, the Executive Councillor
was quietly confident that the devolution deal would give a five year boost to
the construction of new council housing.
The Committee resolved by 12 votes to 0 with 2 abstentions to endorse
the recommendation 2a (i)
The Committee resolved by 6 votes to 0 with 2 abstentions to endorse the
recommendation 2b (ii)
The Executive Councillor
approved the recommendation.