Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Issue
25 2015/16 Revenue and Capital Outturn, Carry Forwards and Significant Variances – HRA PDF 296 KB
Minutes:
Recommendation 2a was chaired by Diana Minns (Vice Chair
/ Tenant Representative) and recommendations 2b was chaired by Councillor
Todd-Jones.
Matter for
Decision
The report presented a summary of the 2015/16 outturn position (actual income and expenditure) for services within the Housing Revenue Account, compared to the current budget for the year.
Decision
of Executive Councillor for Housing
a) Approved carry forward requests totalling £1,987,000 in
revenue funding from 2015/16 to 2016/17, as detailed in Appendix C of the Officer’s report.
b) Approved that carry forward requests of £2,171,000 in HRA
and General Fund Housing capital resources from 2015/16 to 2016/17 to fund rephased net capital spending, as detailed in Appendix D
and the associated notes to the appendix of the Officer’s report is recommended to
Council.
Reason for the Decision
As set out in the Officer’s report.
Any Alternative Options Considered and Rejected
Not applicable.
Scrutiny
Considerations
The Business Manager/Principal Accountant (Shared Housing Finance
Team) said
the following in response to Members’ questions:
i.
Underspends were based on fixed targets and
evidence of where savings had been realised.
ii.
There were high demands on the fencing budgets and
the carry forward reflects funds that had been committed but not yet delivered.
iii.
Members were assured that the disabled adaptations
services had sufficient staff to deliver the service. The fluctuating spends
were a characteristic of the services where high cost adaptations could not be
predicted.
iv.
The Strategic Advisor - Housing and Welfare
Reform explained that a clearer policy and criteria was under development. She
stated that the intention was to make the criteria used to assess claims
clearer to service users. There could be occasions when it was unrealistic to
adapt a property and moving might be suggested as a better option.
The Committee unanimously resolved to endorse the recommendations.
The Executive Councillor
for Housing approved the recommendation.