Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Issue
59 Cambridge Live Performance 2015/16 PDF 110 KB
Additional documents:
Minutes:
Matter for
Decision
2015 was the first year of trading for Cambridge Live, an independent charity set up by the Council. Cambridge Live was contracted by the Council to run the Corn Exchange, Guildhall Event Programme, Cambridge Folk Festival and the City Events Programme. The Officer’s report provided an overview of performance management and proposed new key indicators for the contract.
Decision
of Executive Councillor for Communities
Approved the key performance indicators listed in paragraph 3.4b of the Officer’s report.
Reason for the Decision
As set out in the Officer’s report.
Any Alternative Options Considered and Rejected
Not applicable.
Scrutiny
Considerations
The Committee received a report from the Head of Communities, Arts & Recreation. This was supplemented by a presentation from the Chair of Cambridge Live.
The Committee made the following comments in response to the report:
i.
This was a good time to recognise the hard work by
Officers in setting up Cambridge Live and delivering services.
ii.
The City Council and Cambridge Live worked well
together.
iii.
Cambridge Live were
delivering their contracted obligations.
In response to Members’ questions the Cultural Manager said the following:
i.
Key performance indicators focussed on the Black, Asian
& Minority Ethnic (BAME) community as
these reflected issues that encouraged/discouraged service uptake. It was
assumed that age and gender details were also collected at the same time.
The Executive Councillor for Communities said
he was happy in principle to report BAME, age and gender details collected from
key performance indicators. Officers said they would discuss this with
Cambridge Live.
ii.
Performance against key performance indicators
would be benchmarked against national data as there was no local level data
equivalent.
The Committee unanimously resolved to endorse the recommendation.
The Executive Councillor approved the recommendation.
Conflicts of Interest Declared by the Executive Councillor (and any
Dispensations Granted)
No conflicts of interest
were declared by the Executive Councillor.