Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Issue
119 Cycling Projects Update - SAC PDF 60 KB
This will be an opportunity for Skanska/County Officers to report back on actions taken to address concerns raised by members of the public 5 October 2015.
Also attached is an information note from Bob Menzies (Service Director, Strategy & Development) in response to ‘Issues raised at South Area Committee regarding the bridleway alongside the Guided Busway’ from the 5 October Open Forum.
Additional documents:
Minutes:
Councillor McPherson referred to the 5 October 2015 Committee Action
Sheet.
ACTION |
LEAD OFFICER/MEMBER |
PROGRESS |
Councillor McPherson to
write to Graham Hughes (County Council Executive Director of Economy,
Transport & Environment) to make him aware of issues raised at South Area
Committee regarding the Guided Busway maintenance path that is now used as a
cycleway. |
Councillor McPherson |
Cllr McPherson contacted Graham
Hughes. Joel Carré also contacted Clare Rankin (Cycling and Walking Officer)
so she was aware of the issues raised and had the opportunity to provide any
further information. A response has been received from Bob Menzies Service Director,
Strategy & Development (agenda pack P39 – 40). |
Skanska representatives
to monitor and take enforcement action regarding the following contractor
actions: · Leaving vehicle engines running when stationary. · Parking on verges. · Use of pedestrian friendly barriers ie ones that did
not pose a trip hazard. Skanska representatives
to attend next South Area Committee and give general work progress feedback. |
Skanska representatives |
Mike Davies liaised with Skanska representatives regarding attendance
14 December 2015 SAC to feedback on issues (agenda pack P35 – 38). |
Councillor McPherson invited Mike
Davies (Team Leader - Cycling Projects |
Councillor McPherson |
Mike Davies to attend 14 December 2015 SAC to feedback on issues (agenda pack P35 – 38). |
The Committee received an information report from the Team Leader
(Cycling Projects), Cambridgeshire County Council regarding:
i.
Hills Road Traffic and Safety Scheme.
ii.
City Deal - Cross City Cycling Improvements.
iii.
Cherry Hinton High Street.
iv.
The Tins.
v.
Queen Edith’s Way and Cherry Hinton Road.
vi.
Trumpington Road.
The Committee received an information report from the Scheme Delivery
Manager (Skanska) regarding the Hills Road Traffic and Safety Scheme:
i.
The project was meant to finish in March 2016, but
would now take until the summer.
ii.
Issues raised at the 5 October SAC meeting
regarding the Addenbrooke’s to city centre side of the Hills Road cycleway had
been noted. The intention was to learn from them avoid the same issues during
work on the city centre to Addenbrooke’s side of the Hills Road cycleway.
Skanska was dependent on work by some of its partners (eg UK Power) to
implement this.
The Committee made the following comments in response to the report:
i.
Requested that road user safety be considered when
undertaking work. For example, an uneven road surface and blocked pavements
caused safety concerns, particularly for sensory/mobility impaired people.
ii.
Referred to issues raised earlier in SAC (minute
items 15/116/SAC and 15/117/SAC) regarding unclear signage on the Trumpington
cycleway, and asked if this could be improved through measures such as painting
information (eg end of cycleway) on the cycleway/shared pavement.
The Delivery Manager (Skanska) said the following in response to
questions from Councillors:
i.
Skanska was working with CamSight to address safety
concerns. For example, by moving bus stop locations (to make them more accessible)
and investigating ways to keep people informed of obstacles.
ii.
Contractor induction information covered how staff
could monitor potential hazards, assist passers-by, and erect warnings using
high contrast markings (to make them more obvious).
The Team Leader (Cycling Projects) said the following in response to
questions from Councillors:
i.
The build period for the Trumpington Road scheme
should be confirmed in January 2016.
ii.
There were many shared use paths in the city, and
various issues associated with them as pedestrians/cyclists were unsure where
people could/not cycle. This cross-city issue needed a thorough review to
address, but the County Council was unlikely to be able to do so due to
declining staff and resource levels. The current focus of infrastructure work
was on major projects where funding could be bid for (eg from Central
Government) to implement this. It may be possible to address cycleway
information issues through maintenance work.
iii.
The Cambridge Cycling Campaign gave out Highway
Code information at Fresher Fairs and language schools to try and improve cycle
safety in the city.
iv.
There was a joint City and County Council project
team to co-ordinate 20 MPH, public realm and cycleway work in Cherry Hinton.
The intention was to limit disruption to residents.