Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Issue
32 Annual Update About the Work of our Strategic Partnerships PDF 303 KB
Minutes:
Matter for
Decision
The Officer’s report provided an update on the key external partnerships the Council was involved with. It was given on an annual basis and is part of a commitment given in the Council’s “Principles of Partnership Working”. This year the partnerships were shown in a single report to allow members to take an overview of their activities. In some cases members may have been aware of current issues arising from a partnership as a result of recent reports about their activities to committees.
Decision of the Leader
Approved continuing to work with key external partnerships (LEP, City Deal, Cambridge Community Safety Partnership, Health and Wellbeing Board, Children’s Trust and RECAP) to ensure that public agencies and others can together address the strategic issues affecting Cambridge and that the concerns of Cambridge citizens are responded to.
Reason for the Decision
As set out in the Officer’s report.
Any Alternative Options Considered and Rejected
Not applicable.
Scrutiny
Considerations
The Committee received a report from the Strategy Officer.
In response to Members’ questions the Leader said the following:
i.
The Leader attended Local Enterprise Partnership
(LEP) meetings on behalf of the authority as an observer, but did not vote.
ii.
In his view, the LEP had got better at bidding for
Central Government funding in the last year. The
government revealed in July 2014 that the LEP would be provided with £21.1
million as a part of its Growth Deal. The LEP does help the overall prosperity
of Cambridgeshire.
iii.
The Leader expected that LEPs would be reviewed
by the new Government after the May 2015 General election.
iv.
Councillor
Roberts and supporting officers were responsible for activities regarding the
Local Health Partnership during 2014/15. There were lots of meetings regarding
this area, which required more integration of organisational agendas and more
resources to deliver actions.
v.
The City Deal
had a two stage process: Assembly and Board. This provided an opportunity for
transparency and engagement with wider representatives. Monthly meetings could
be expected from autumn 2015 onwards. The partnership between three councils
was important for the future of the City.
The Committee unanimously resolved to endorse the recommendations.
The Executive Councillor
approved the recommendation.
Conflicts of Interest Declared by the Executive Councillor (and any
Dispensations Granted)
No conflicts of interest
were declared by the Executive Councillor.