Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Issue
68 14/1077/FUL - 218 - 220 Mill Road PDF 91 KB
Additional documents:
Minutes:
The Committee received an application for
full planning permission.
The application sought (retrospective) approval for rendering external wall and painting in soft stone colour.
The Committee
received representations in objection to the application from the following:
·
Chris
Freeman
·
Allen
Brigham
Chris Freeman’s
representation covered the following issues:
i.
The
street scape had been destroyed.
ii.
In a conservation area, appearances matter.
iii.
Other shops had maintained the Victorian facade.
iv.
Is not acceptable, even if other properties have
taken this approach prior to area gaining conservation status.
v.
Character of the area should be conserved.
Allen Brigham’s representation covered the following issues:
vi.
Approving this would be endorsing a race to the
bottom.
vii.
Conservation area should be improved.
viii.
Conservation status should be inspiring.
ix.
Need to be very clear that this is not related to
external insulation.
The Committee:
Resolved (by 7 votes to 1)
to refuse the application
contrary to the officer recommendations for the following reasons:
The rendered finish, because of its
prominence and its extent, would cause significant harm to the character of the
conservation area, in which the original brick predominates, contrary to
policies 3/4 and 4/11 of the Cambridge Local Plan 2006.