Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Issue
13 Memorandum of Understanding – Greater Cambridge Housing Trajectory PDF 30 KB
Additional documents:
Minutes:
Matter for
Decision
The Officer’s
report set out the need for a Memorandum of Understanding between Cambridge
City Council and South Cambridgeshire District Council. The Memorandum of
Understanding states that, as part of the two Local Plan examinations, the
housing trajectories for the two areas should be considered together as a joint
trajectory for the purposes of housing supply, including a five year land
supply.
Changes in
circumstances since the submission of the Local Plans indicate that a
Memorandum of Understanding between the Councils will demonstrate the soundness
of the plans.
Decision
of Executive Councillor for Planning Policy and Transport
Approved the Memorandum of
Understanding between Cambridge City Council and South Cambridgeshire District
Council set out in Appendix 1 of the Officer’s report.
Reason for the Decision
As set out in the Officer’s report.
Any Alternative Options Considered and Rejected
Not applicable.
Scrutiny
Considerations
The Committee received a report from the Planning Policy Manager. She
referred to the meeting of Joint Strategic Transport and Spatial Planning Group
09:30 on 9 September 2014 where the Memorandum of Understanding was approved
without amendment.
In response to Members’ questions the Planning Policy Manager said the
following:
i. The Memorandum of Understanding would feed into the Local Plan examination process. South Cambridgeshire and the City Council housing trajectories were being considered together to show there was a five year housing supply. Any costs awarded against an individual council after a planning appeal would not be shared with the other council.
ii. The purpose of the South Cambridgeshire and the City Council Local Plans was to set out planning policies and demonstrate sufficient land supply to meet demand. The Councils were confident that they had made their cases but the Planning Inspector may take a different view.
iii. South Cambridgeshire Council had thought it had a five year housing supply, but discovered it did not when challenged through appeals. The Planning Policy Manager reiterated that South Cambridgeshire and the City Councils did have a five year housing supply when considered together.
The Committee unanimously resolved to endorse the recommendation.
The Executive Councillor approved the recommendation.
The Executive Councillor
made the following remarks:
i.
There was a countywide Memorandum of Co-operation
in effect.
ii.
This had been established before Local Plans were
developed, but Local Plans built on the Memorandum of Co-operation.
iii.
Each local authority agreed to take an allocation
of housing and employment numbers.
iv.
The Memorandum of Understanding worked in parallel
with the Memorandum of Co-operation, both would be presented to the Planning
Inspector at the Local Plan examination.
v.
It was hoped the Planning Inspector would make an
interim judgement to give the Memorandum of Understanding some weight for
consideration in planning appeals once it was in the public domain.
Conflicts of Interest Declared by the Executive Councillor (and any
Dispensations Granted)
No conflicts of interest
were declared by the Executive Councillor.