Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Issue
44 Local Centres Improvement Programme PDF 184 KB
Minutes:
Matter for
Decision
At its meeting on February 27, 2014, Council
agreed to create a programme to improve selected local centres in the
city. The program would run from the
2014/15 financial year and include a total budget of £635,000.00 to
2017/18. At least three projects would
be undertaken for completion by 2018/19).
The purpose of the report was to set out the planning policy background
to local centres; proposed criteria in the selection of projects; and expected
approval and consultation arrangements for the programme.
Decision
of Executive Councillor for City Centre and Public Places
The Executive Councillor resolved:
i.
to
approve the proposed approach to the Local Centres Improvement Programme for
the years 2014 to 2020 as set out in the Officer’s report, specifically:
a)
the audit
criteria and approach to the selection of local centres;
b)
the need for a
report back to the October 2014 meeting of the Customer and Community Services
Committee with the outcomes and recommendations from the local centres audit
and selection process; and
c)
the creation of a
Project Board to oversee the projects once agreed by the Executive Councillor
for City Centre and Public Places
Reason for the Decision
As set out in the Officer’s report.
Any Alternative Options Considered and Rejected
Not applicable.
Scrutiny
Considerations
The Committee received a report from the Urban Design and
Conservation Manager.
The Committee made the following comments in response to the report:
i.
Expressed disappointment that more could not be
done for Mitcham’s Corner.
ii.
Members praised the work done by the Friends of Mitcham’s Corner and expressed the hope that the gyratory system could be removed.
iii.
Councillor
Robertson requested an amendment to the report to reflect the fact that the
station area included parts of Petersfield and not
just Trumpington.
The Executive Councillor stated that the
importance of Mitcham’s Corner had been recognised, A
Chesterton co-ordinator would be appointed and a sensible, long-term approach
could be agreed including investigation of funding options.
The Urban Design and Conservation Manager stated that work was on-going with the County Council and spending money on short term window dressing would be poor value for money. He suggested that Members might wish to consider a two centre plan in October, with the option of holding funding for a third centre, Mitcham’s Corner, for the future.
The Committee resolved unanimously to endorse the recommendation.
The Executive Councillor approved the recommendation.