Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Issue
40 Review of Community Development and Arts and Recreation Development Grants PDF 228 KB
Additional documents:
Minutes:
Matter for
Decision
To agree new grant
priorities and desired outcomes for Community, Arts and Recreation Development
Grants to be used for assessing all future applications.
To agree the budget for Community, Arts and
Recreation Development Grants from 2015/16.
Decision
of Executive Councillor for Community, Arts and Recreation
The
Executive Councillor resolved:
i.
to agree new priorities and outcomes for the Council’s
Community, Arts and Recreation Development Grants as set out in Section 7,
paragraphs 7.1 and 7.2 of the Officer’s report;
ii.
that, the 2015/16 budget for Community, Arts and Recreation
Development Grants is provisionally set as £900,000 subject to confirmation as
part of the 2015/16 budget round;
iii.
that, once confirmed as part of
the 2015/16 budget round, the budget for Community, Arts and Recreation
Development Grants will be frozen at that level for a further two years
(2016/17 and 2017/18);
iv.
that the amount of the overall
budget devolved to area committees for 2015/16 is provisionally set as £80,000
and distributed as set out in Section 7, paragraph 7.3c, subject to
confirmation at Community Services Scrutiny Committee in January 2015; and
v.
that the Community, Arts and Recreation Development Grants
are renamed ‘Community Grants’.
Reason for the Decision
As set out in the Officer’s report.
Any Alternative Options Considered and Rejected
Not applicable.
Scrutiny
Considerations
The Committee received a report from the Head of Community Development regarding new grant priorities and desired outcomes for
Community, Arts and Recreation Development Grants.
The Committee made the following comments in response to the report:
i.
Expressed concerns that they were being asked to
agree cuts without fully understanding the impact that would have on services.
i.
Some members argued that the Junction was a special
case and should be allowed extra time for new management structures to achieve
results.
ii.
Some members stated that the budget should not be
agreed until all applications had been received.
In response to Members’ questions the Head of Community Development said the following:
iii.
The proposed priorities and outcomes will focus
future grant funding on helping those residents who have the highest needs
whether this is because of poverty or because they experience barriers due to
equalities issues.
iv.
No individual funding decisions are being requested
today.
v.
The Executive Councillor was being asked to agree
future priorities and desired outcomes against which future applications would
be assessed.
vi.
Some voluntary sector groups and organisations
would be well placed to deliver the desired outcomes while others might need to
seek funding elsewhere if they are
unable to meet the proposed priorities and outcomes.
vii.
Positive meetings had been held with groups
representing the voluntary sector.
viii.
Consultation had suggested that an average 25%
grant reduction was sustainable for most services.
ix.
The Junction was in year three of a three year
agreement. There is currently no agreement to fund the Junction beyond 2014/15.
This would be dependent upon the Junction’s grant application which would be
assessed against the proposed priorities and outcomes in the same way as
applications from all other voluntary sector groups and organisations.
Councillor Reid stated that setting a budget cut ahead of budget setting
decision was premature. She stated that further information was needed to allow
proper debate and proposed the following amendment to the recommendations
(delete wording struck through and insert the underlined):
i.
To agree new priorities and outcomes for the Council’s
Community, Arts and Recreation Development Grants as set out in Section 7,
paragraphs 7.1 and 7.2 of the Officer’s report;
ii.
That a decision as to the
future funding of the Junction is made after a
review by CSSC of the Junction's viability;
iii.
That, the 2015/16 budget for Community, Arts and Recreation
Development Grants is provisionally set as £900,000 subject to confirmation as
part of the 2015/16 budget round;
iv.
That the 2015/16 budget for Community
Arts and Recreation Grants is set at a level which will protect services for
those with high needs, the level to be
ascertained following the grant application round;
v.
That, once confirmed as part of
the 2015/16 budget round, the budget for Community, Arts and Recreation
Development Grants will be frozen at that level for a further two years
(2016/17 and 2017/18);
vi.
That the amount of the overall
budget devolved to area committees for 2015/16 is provisionally set as £80,000
and distributed as set out in Section 7, paragraph 7.3c, subject to
confirmation at Community Services Scrutiny Committee in January 2015; and
vii.
That the Community, Arts and Recreation Development Grants
are renamed ‘Community Grants’.
The Director of
Customer and Community Services stated that this process had built in a long
lead in time to allow clarity and stability for the sector
Councillor Reid
requested that her amendment be considered in two stages amended
recommendations i and ii, followed by amended
recommendations iii to vii.
On a show of hands
amended recommendations i and ii were lost by 4 votes
to 3.
On a show of hands
amended recommendations iii to vii were lost by 4 votes to 3.
Councillor Reid
requested that the substantive recommendations be considered individually.
The Committee resolved unanimously to endorse the recommendation i.
The Committee resolved by 4 votes to 3 to endorse the recommendation ii.
The Committee resolved unanimously to endorse the recommendation iii.
The Committee resolved unanimously to endorse the recommendation iv.
The Committee resolved unanimously to endorse the recommendation v.
The Executive Councillor approved the recommendations.