Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Issue
72 S106 Proposals of the Cambridge and South Cambridgeshire Transport Plans PDF 48 KB
Minutes:
The Committee received a report from the Capital and Funding Manager (Cambridgeshire County Council) regarding the process for allocating Corridor Area Transport Plan (CATP) S106 funding. The Officer updated the Committee on existing schemes as detailed in the report.
The Committee also made the following comments in response to the report.
Crossing facilities
across Newmarket Road from Meadowlands to Jack Warren
Councillor Hart was concerned that the
The Committee noted that the Chisholm Trail Plan proposal
would be included in the Local Plan. The results of a feasibility study into
the bridge section of the Trail were expected shortly. It was suggested that
the East Area Committee might wish to consider part funding this as a joint
project with the North Area
Committee.
The Committee discussed the
The Committee questioned how much funding might be available to CATP in the future and how much a new bridge would cost. The Officer stated that the introduction of the Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL) would end the CATP funding stream and, while the date of the introduction date for CIL is uncertain, is was unlikely that future funding available to the East Area Committee would be more that £200,000. A new bridge would cost in excess of two million pounds. The Officer confirmed that the plans for Chesterton Station included the bridge but stated that no funding had been allocated. Other funding sources were being explored including the potential of funding through the proposed city deal.
Some members were concerned that allocating funding to an expensive project, that might never happen, might not be best use of limited resources. However, the Committee agreed that the point of the funding was mitigation and the biggest mitigation impact would be a new bridge. Making a commitment to fund some of the cost of the bridge as a ‘statement of intent’ in the region of £50,000 was proposed. The Committee received an assurance that, should the project be abandoned, the funding would return to the East Area Committee for re-allocation.
Councillor Bourke requested that the Committee recommended
to the County Council’s Cabinet, completion of the
The Committee questioned why proposals for Tenison Road traffic calming measures had never been presented to the working group and asked for this to be arranged.
Action: Capital and Funding Manager
Real Time Passenger Information Coldhams Lane
Real Time Passenger Information was needed in this busy area
such as the Broadway on
Vehicle Activated
Signs for
The Committee questioned who should apply for a Local Highway Improvement Scheme grant. The Officer confirmed that any individual could apply and that he would supply more information.
Action: Capital and Funding Manager
Key Projects in the
Eastern Gate Supplementary Planning Document (SPD)
The Chair stated that a lot of change was currently taking place in the area covered by the Eastern Gate SPD. It may therefore, be apposite to carry out a feasibility study into the transport improvement proposals covered in the SPD to better link the two sides of this part of Newmarket Road.
Riverside
Environmental Projects
The Chair also reminded members of previous part funding of environmental improvements on Riverside by the East Area Committee. This allowed the first phase of the project to be carried out. The Chair recalled n East Area Commitment to support further phases of the enhancement project when funding allowed.
New Proposal
Councillor Johnson proposed a project that would link to the
Resolved: (unanimously)
i. That all schemes considered eligible for CATP funding would remain in the plan.
Resolved (by 14 votes to 1)
ii. To allocate 25% of the current East Area CATP pot to the Chisholm Trail bridge.
iii. To allocate £50,000 (from funding available after the above) to carry out feasibility studies into the key projects identified in the Eastern Gate SPD.