Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Decision details
Decision Maker: Executive Councillor for Housing
Decision status: Recommendations Approved
Is Key decision?: No
Is subject to call in?: No
None - This report is for information and not for decision.
Matter for
Decision
The report provided an update on the compliance related activities delivered
within the City Services Compliance Team, including a summary on gas,
electrical, fire, lifts, legionella and asbestos.
Decision
of Executive Councillor for Housing and Homelessness
i.
Noted the progress of the compliance related work detailed
within the Officer’s report.
Reason for the Decision
As set out in the
Officer’s report.
Any Alternative
Options Considered and Rejected
Not applicable.
Scrutiny
Considerations
The Committee received
a report from the City Services Director reference was also made to an updated
report which had been published online and circulated to members in advance of
the meeting and contained the most up to date information regarding compliance.
The City Services Director said the following in response to Members’
questions:
i.
Agreed that a monthly report would be provided to
the Committee regarding compliance information, and this could then be reduced
once the council was in a more stable position.
ii.
A more formal Housing Leadership Board had been
established which would meet monthly to review compliance standards.
iii.
With reference to the reports of damp,
condensation, and mould (DCM), noted that the up-to-date figure of DCM cases
was 408. Referred to the procedure officers followed for reports of DCM.
Advised that information regarding the status of these cases would need to be
provided outside of the meeting.
iv.
Plans for engagement with residents regarding DCM
included the provision of information on the council’s YouTube channel and
other social media channels, leaflet drops and briefing other council
Departments who engaged with the public so that they had the information to
refer residents to the DCM Team when questions / issues arose.
v.
The city had been mapped to identify properties
believed to be at risk of DCM and these were prioritised, checked, and
investigated.
The Committee resolved by 8 votes to 0 with 3 abstentions to endorse the
recommendation.
The Executive Councillor
approved the recommendation.
Conflicts of Interest
Declared by the Executive Councillor (and any Dispensations Granted)
No conflicts of interest
were declared by the Executive Councillor.
Publication date: 26/02/2024
Date of decision: 23/01/2024