Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Decision details
Decision Maker: Executive Councillor for Transformation
Decision status: Recommendations Approved
Is Key decision?: No
Is subject to call in?: No
Asked to note report
Matter for Decision
By the time this report was received by the Strategy and
Resources Committee on Monday 27th March, the 4DW Phase One trial, which
included the Shared Planning Service, would be nearing its completion. The
Officer’s report provides a brief insight into the first two months of the
trial including KPI performance for the Shared Planning Service (which was as
much data as was available up to the report deadline date). The report also
sets out the next stage of the process, in terms of final evaluation of the
trial.
Decision of the Executive Councillor for Finance,
Resources, Transformation and Non-Statutory Deputy Leader:
i.
Note
the report and agreed the decision option highlighted in 3.11 for the next stage
of the process; a special meeting of the Strategy and Resources Scrutiny
Committee will meet and debate the issues to inform a decision the Executive
Councillor would make on 15th May.
ii.
Provide
any feedback thought relevant to the Chief Executive of South Cambridgeshire
District Council.
Reason for the Decision
As set out in the Officer’s
report.
Any Alternative Options
Considered and Rejected
Not applicable.
Scrutiny Considerations
The Chief Executive of South Cambridgeshire
District Council introduced the report.
The Chief Executive of South
Cambridgeshire District Council said the following in response to Members’
questions:
i.
The
data in appendix 2 of the Officer’s report (the Pulse survey) was more of a temperature
check. The data that they would be using to measure health and wellbeing would
be a survey run by Robertson Cooper Ltd, an external agency. It would be a
120-question survey. The survey would be launched later this week and it will
be open for 3 weeks.
ii.
There
were surveys for people who were specifically not in the trial to ask what the
impact was in consequence of people participating in the trial. Apart from
Waste Services there were few people not involved in the trial.
iii.
The
main driver behind trialling the 4-day week was concerns about recruitment.
South Cambridgeshire District Council (SCDC), prior to the trial was carrying
over £2 million in employment agency costs as staff turnover was high, which is
costly and disruptive. Though could not reasonably expect to get rid of all
agency costs, could reasonably expect to get rid of much of those costs which
would reduce the cost of services for taxpayers. Therefore, it was in SCDC’s
interests to make those sorts of savings and efficiencies rather than cutting
or reducing services.
iv.
No
decisions have been made regarding extending the trial at this point. Officers
would be providing data and evidence to SCDC Cabinet and to Cambridge City
Council Scrutiny Committee. Both Councils would make their decision based on
that data and evidence.
v.
Recruitment
was a key issue. The reason for extending the trial for a year was that SCDC
could not measure the impact on recruitment in 3 months. The reason the trial
did not start with a year was that it was too risky, as this was the first
trial in the public sector of the 4-day week. Started with 3 months to see if
SCDC could run functionally and see if the performance could be kept up for
that time. If trial extended a year would have better data regarding recruitment
and retention.
vi.
It
was always the plan to do a 3-month trial to see if performance was maintained.
vii.
The
health and wellbeing survey being launched would identify which service
employees belonged to. Therefore, there would be data from people working in
the planning service, how they fed back in August 2023 and how they were
feeding back in March 2023 as a comparison.
viii.
There
would be questions about whether people were able to complete their work in 4
days. Staff would be asked if they wished to be included in the trial if it was
extended. Those who do not wish to continue in the trail and wish to work a
5-day week are welcome to do so. Staff who wanted to continue on a 4-day week
but are struggling with workload would be provided with support to help them manage
their workload.
ix.
Employees
could opt out of the trial is they so wish.
x.
The
planning service had vastly improved its service in the last year.
xi.
The
SCDC Chief Executive agreed that quality of work in the planning service must
be maintained during the trial.
xii.
During
the past 6 months SCDC had done more transformation than in the last 3 and a
half years combined. The reason was that people want to be more productive, as
they were now invested in this process and want the trial to be successful.
xiii.
It was SCDC policy to respond to residents
within 14 working days. This would not be affected if an employee had a
non-working day on a Friday, so they did not respond to a resident until the
following Monday.
xiv.
It
would have been preferable to trial waste services first, but it was a much
more complicated to do. This was due to doing a round optimisation exercise
which was complex and had taken several months.
xv.
Would
be able to provide KPI’s regarding processing times for planning applications
from before the trial began and during the trial.
xvi.
Staff
could choose any day they wished to off at the beginning of the trial. During the
trial SCDC realised that it is easier to choose either a Monday or a Friday as
a non-working day and have Tuesday-Thursday as core working days. It was still
to be determined if this was what would remain in place going forward.
xvii.
No-one
specifically requested a 4-day working week. This was an idea put forward by
the Chief Executive of SCDC based on discussions with colleagues regarding
staff recruitment and retention.
xviii.
Stated
that salary was not always the most important factor in recruiting and retention.
Based on her conversations SCDC Chief Executive has discovered that quality of
life and work/life balance was just as important.
The Committee noted the report.
The Committee resolved (4-0 with 2 abstentions) to endorse
the recommendations.:
i.
That
a special meeting of the Strategy and Resources Scrutiny Committee could meet
and debate the issues to inform a decision the Executive Councillor would make
on 15th May.
The Executive Councillor for Finance, Resources and
Transformation and Non-Statutory Deputy Leader approved the recommendations.
Conflicts of Interest Declared by the Executive Councillor (and any
Dispensations Granted)
No conflicts of interest
were declared by the Executive Councillor.
Publication date: 10/07/2023
Date of decision: 27/03/2023