Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Decision details
Decision Maker: Executive Councillor for Housing
Decision status: Recommendations Approved
Is Key decision?: No
Is subject to call in?: No
- To approve the Council’s Void Management Policy and re-written '5 point promise'(changed to the 'Re-let Standard').
- To acknowledge that this policy, the new Re-Let standard and any processes being put in place now, will need to be kept under review whilst the Government's White Paper for social housing is still in development.
Matter for
Decision
The report detailed a review of current council voids
repair processes which had been undertaken, with a programme
of communication with tenants and prospective tenants scheduled from January
2023.
Decision
of Executive Councillor for Housing
i.
Approved the Council’s Void Management Policy and the revised
re-let standard, recognising the factors influencing the Policy that has
resulted in the prioritised works to be undertaken in the stock whilst vacant.
ii.
Agreed the revised Cambridge Re-Let Standard and note how the
Standard will be communicated to current tenants looking to transfer and those
on the Housing Register, via the Council’s website and in the Sign-up pack.
iii.
Recognised that this Policy will need to be reviewed again
within 2 years, as the Government White Paper for Social Housing Regulation was
not yet passed as formal legislation at the time of writing this report and we
believe this will have implications on this Policy, once in place.
Reason for the Decision
As set out in the
Officer’s report.
Any Alternative
Options Considered and Rejected
Not applicable.
Scrutiny
Considerations
The Committee
received a report from the Head of Housing Maintenance and Assets.
The Head of Housing Maintenance and Assets said the following in
response to Members’ questions:
i.
Factors which contributed to the increased void
management workload included properties earmarked for specific initiatives ie: rough sleeper accommodation which needed to be turned
around quickly and properties required for decanting tenants from blocks
earmarked for redevelopment, unauthorised alterations by tenants which
necessitated remedial works by the council.
ii.
Tenancy audits would assist in picking up concerns
about property conditions. Sub-contractors had been used to assist in-house
officer’s workloads.
iii.
Tenancy agreements contained a clause requiring
tenants to maintain and leave a property in a certain condition. Costs spent by
the Council to undertake any remedial works that are considered rechargeable
repairs would be added onto a Tenant’s Arrears Account.
iv.
Statutory provisions were available to gain access
to properties when tenants refused access, however this was an un-tested area.
In response to concerns raised by the
Committee, the Director of Neighbourhoods and Communities advised that an
update report would be brought back to Committee in a years’ time. It was also
noted within recommendation 2.3 that the Void Management Policy may need to be
updated in any event when legislation arising from the Government’s White Paper
for Social Housing Regulation was passed.
The Committee unanimously resolved to endorse the recommendations.
The Executive Councillor
approved the recommendations.
Conflicts of Interest
Declared by the Executive Councillor (and any Dispensations Granted)
No conflicts of interest
were declared by the Executive Councillor.
Publication date: 10/03/2023
Date of decision: 24/01/2023