Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Decision details
Decision Maker: Executive Councillor for Housing
Decision status: Recommendations Approved
Is Key decision?: Yes
Is subject to call in?: No
Approval in principle of HRA revenue carry forwards from 2021/22 into 2022/23.
Matter for
Decision
The report presented details of anticipated variances
from budgets, where resources are requested to be carried forward into the
2022/23 financial year in order to undertake or complete activities anticipated
to have taken place in 2021/22.
The position in relation to rephasing of any
investment as part of the Housing Capital Investment Plan would be reported to
Housing Scrutiny Committee in the June 2022 committee cycle, alongside final
revenue carry forward requests.
Decision
of Executive Councillor for Housing
i.
Agreed the provisional carry forward requests, totalling
£1,416,280 as detailed in the revised Appendix A, subject to the final outturn
position.
Reason for the Decision
As set out in the
Officer’s report.
Any Alternative
Options Considered and Rejected
Not applicable.
Scrutiny
Considerations
The Committee
received a report from the Assistant Head of
Finance and Business Manager.
The Assistant Head of Finance and Business Manager and the Head of Housing
Maintenance and Assets said the following in response to Members’ questions:
i.
In a number of cases the carry forwards were to
complete work which had already begun under an existing contract where there
was a fixed price within the contract to complete the work. Any areas where
prices weren’t fixed were included in the budget process for 2022/23. This
included an additional amount for inflation which wasn’t allocated out to
individual expenditure heads to allow this to be allocated in-year to any areas
which were subject to higher than anticipated levels of inflation. Since this
provision was made in January, inflation has continued to increase. Resource
would be allocated accordingly to any areas where financial pressure occurred.
This would be reviewed with the budget before the Mid-Year Financial Strategy
was brought to Committee in September.
ii.
The heat and smoke detector installation delays
weren’t due to officer/contractor capacity but was due to the ability of the
council to gain access to properties. Officers were exploring other ways to
gain access to properties, which included for example seeing if works could be
undertaken at the same time as gas servicing checks.
The Committee unanimously resolved to endorse the recommendation.
The Executive Councillor
approved the recommendation.
Conflicts of Interest
Declared by the Executive Councillor (and any Dispensations Granted)
No conflicts of interest
were declared by the Executive Councillor.
Publication date: 04/05/2022
Date of decision: 15/03/2022