Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Decision details
Decision Maker: Executive Councillor for External Partnerships
Decision status: Recommendations Approved
Is Key decision?: No
Is subject to call in?: No
To enable the Committee to scrutinise the Council's representative on the Combined Authority.
Matter for
Decision
The report
provided an update on the activities of the Cambridgeshire and Peterborough
Combined Authority (CPCA) since the 7 October meeting of Strategy &
Resources Scrutiny Committee.
Decision of Executive
Councillor for Strategy and External Partnerships
i.
Noted the update on
issues considered at the meetings of the Combined Authority held on 30 October 2019,
27 November 2019 and 29 January 2020.
Reason for the Decision
As set out in the
Officer’s report.
Any Alternative
Options Considered and Rejected
Not applicable.
Scrutiny Considerations
The Committee
received a report from the Chief Executive and noted the decision notice of the
Combined Authority Board meeting held on the 29 January 2020, which was
circulated at the meeting.
The Committee made
the following comments in response to the report:
i.
Asked why the lead members and chairs of
committees in the Combined Authority
structure did not have a representative from Cambridge City or South
Cambridgeshire District Council.
ii.
Questioned the £100,000 homes business case.
iii.
Asked if the Local Transport Plan which had been
approved at the most recent Combined Authority Board meeting had retained
reference to the role about demand management and highway congestion.
iv.
Questioned what the impending Cam Metro
consultation would be about as there seemed to be little or no information
about it.
Councillor Herbert said the following in response to Members’ questions:
i.
The Combined Authority Mayor appointed the Deputy
Mayor and the lead members. Neither he
nor the leader of South Cambridgeshire District Council had been appointed to
chair any of the committees.
ii.
The committee model had improved representation on
the Combined Authority and he noted that there had been a number of changes to
various local authority leaders since the inception of the Combined Authority.
iii.
The homes business case was about trialling
different types of development within the different Combined Authority areas.
He hoped to see trials in Cambridge and South Cambridgeshire but this would
depend on how the funding could be brought together.
iv.
He would follow up the Local Transport Plan query.
v.
He could not add anything further to the query
regarding the Cam Metro consultation. He hoped as the authority most affected
that the City Council would have had the opportunity to see the consultation
before it went public however, he anticipated that the City Council would see
the consultation at the same time as everyone else.
The Committee noted the report.
Conflicts of Interest
Declared by the Executive Councillor (and any Dispensations Granted)
No conflicts of interest
were declared by the Executive Councillor.
Publication date: 02/04/2020
Date of decision: 03/02/2020