Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Decision details
Decision Maker: Executive Councillor for Planning, Building Control, and Infrastructure
Decision status: Recommendations Approved
Is Key decision?: No
Is subject to call in?: No
To note Building Control Service annual report 2017/18.
Matter for Decision
To note the content
of the 3Cs Shared Service Annual Report for the 3Cs Building Control Shared
Services and the Greater Cambridge Shared Planning Service during 2017/18.
Decision of Executive Councillor for Planning Policy and
Transport
Resolved: To
note the report.
Reason for the
Decision
As set out in the Officer’s report.
Any Alternative Options Considered and Rejected
Not applicable.
Scrutiny Considerations
The Committee received a report from the Strategic Director.
The report summarised the performance for the 3Cs Building
Control Shared Services, and the Greater Cambridge Shared Planning Service
during 2017/18.
The Business Plans for the Shared Building Control and Planning
Services had been approved by the City Council, Huntingdon District Council and
South Cambridgeshire District Council Committees in March 2018.
The Strategic Director and the 3C Strategic Lead Officer
said the following in response to Members’ questions:
i.
The arrangements for shared planning services
and TUPE arrangements to South Cambridgeshire District Council had been
designed so that officers could work as a single team from the start.
ii.
The working practices of planning services and
the different types of services available were being looked at as a priority,
to determine best practice.
iii.
The Director of Economic and Planning
Development had had recently recruited two associate directors to ensure that
the senior management structure allowed strategic thinking time to bring a
standard way of working.
iv.
Noted the Committee’s request for a report to be
brought to a future meeting outlining the differences of the planning services
working practices.
v.
When shared services had been set up there had
been an expectation that savings would be made from the start. This had not
been made immediately but it would happen and should be shown after further
twelve month period.
vi.
When looking at the finances of both services it
was important to remember if planning services had fewer applications this
would equate to lower income. However alternative revenue streams would be
looked at as part of the strategic process.
vii.
The next Annual Report would demonstrate where
potential savings had been identified or even made.
viii.
In the latter half of 2017, Building Control had
cut ties with all agency staff in order to reduce costs. This had equated to an
expected drop in performance for a period of time until four permanent staff
members had been recruited. A further two vacancies would be filled as and when
the workload required.
ix.
Would double check the figure quoted in 4.1.3 of
the Officer’s report regarding to ensure this was correct.
x.
The overall expenditure and income included fee
earning and non-fee earning work (70% and 30% split); the fee earning was an
income target set against expenditure. This showed that Building Control Shared
Services had overspent by £25,696 in 2017/18.
xi.
The overspend of
£25,696 had been recovered from the reserves. This had allowed the service to
review their fees as the income was less than the cost of the service.
xii.
The variance of the final outturn figure was due
to the cost of the apprentice, which had been a Cambridge City apprentice
scheme.
xiii.
Suggested that future Annual Plans could reflect
on performance against the original Business Plan.
The Committee endorsed the recommendation to note the report
by 7 votes to 0 as set out in the Officer’s report.
The Executive Councillor approved the recommendation.
Publication date: 12/10/2018
Date of decision: 26/06/2018