Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Decision details
Decision Maker: Executive Councillor for Transformation
Decision status: Recommendations Approved
Is Key decision?: No
Is subject to call in?: No
To agree to £90,000 Cambridge City Council contribution towards ICT provision for the Greater Cambridge Planning Service as set out in the officer report. £60,000 did not have budget provision.
CAMBRIDGE CITY
COUNCIL
Record
of Executive Decision
ICT GREATER CAMBRIDGE PLANNING SERVICE |
Decision
of: |
Councillor
Robertson, Executive Councillor for Finance and Resources |
||
Reference: |
18/URGENCY/SR/01 |
||
Date
of decision: |
16/3/18 |
Recorded
on: 16/3/18 |
|
Decision
Type: |
Non-Key
Decision |
||
Matter for Decision: |
To agree to £90,000 Cambridge City Council contribution towards ICT
provision for the Greater Cambridge Planning Service as set out in the
officer report. £60,000 did not have budget provision. |
||
Why The
Decision Had To Be Made (And Any Alternative Options):
|
This is explained in the detailed officer
report attached. |
||
The Executive Councillor’s decision(s): |
To agree to £90,000 Cambridge City Council contribution towards ICT
provision for the Greater Cambridge Planning Service as set out in the
officer report. This will be funded
from ICT provision for the shared service (£30,000) and via capital receipt
(£60,000)
|
||
Reasons for the decision: |
This is
described in the officer report attached. Part 4C
section 6.1 of the Councils Constitution, permits decisions to be taken which
are outside of the budget framework if the decision is: a matter of
urgency (answer-it is) it is not
practical to convene a quorate meeting of the Council (answer- it is not practical) and the Chair of the Strategy and Resources Scrutiny Committee agrees the
matter is of urgency. The next
available ordinary Full Council meeting is the 19 April 2018 which is too
late. |
||
Scrutiny consideration: |
The spokesperson of the strategy and resources scrutiny committee was
advised that the chair agreed that the
matter was urgent
|
||
Report: |
An officer report detailing the background and financial considerations
is attached. |
||
Conflicts of interest: |
None
|
||
Comments: |
This urgent decision will be reported back to the next Full Council
meeting on 19 April 2018. |
Cambridge City Council
Item
To: Executive
Councillor for Finance and Resources: Councillor Richard Robertson
Report by: Stephen
Kelly, Joint Director of Planning and Economic Development
Relevant scrutiny
committee: Strategy and Resources
Scrutiny Committee
Urgent Decision
Wards affected: All
Wards
Greater Cambridge Planning Service ICT
Provision
Non - Key Decision
1. Executive summary
1.1 The
proposal for the Greater Cambridge Shared Planning Service was approved at the
Council’s Strategy & Resources Scrutiny Committee on 20 March 2017. One of
the key drivers for the success of this project is an appropriate single
software system.
1.2 Demonstrations
from the existing suppliers and another potential supplier has
been received. An independent consultant
also undertook a GAP analysis in a review of the current two planning systems
run by the respective councils.. It was identified that upgrading the current
Cambridge City Council (CCC) system, already embedded in CCC systems and
extending it to South Cambridgeshire District Council (SCDC) on a phased basis
will optimise the functionality of the system and minimise the cost to
CCC.
1.3 The
proposal has been supported by the 3C ICT Project Board and the CCC Capital
Board subject to the allocation of additional project management resources
being allocated as mitigation to the risks identified.
1.4 The
costs of the upgraded software are to be shared proportionally between SCDC and
CCC, although in accordance with previous approaches project management is
shared equally. Apart from the benefit
of there being a single supplier, the proposal represents a small saving on
annual maintenance cost to CCC, with no increases over a five-year period.
1.5 Procurement of the upgraded software will be
through the Crown Commercial Services (CCS )
Framework.
1.6 The reason for an urgent decision is the need
to secure the benefits of the new contract before the end of the existing
(annual) contract and secure the project management resource.
2. Recommendations
The Executive Councillor, is recommended, under
urgency, to approve the expenditure of £90,000 as a contribution towards the
cost of ICT provision for the Greater Cambridge Shared Planning Service,
including £30,000 towards ICT project management:
3. Background
3.1 The
proposal for the creation of a Greater Cambridge Shared Planning Service was
approved at Strategy & Resources Scrutiny Committee on 20 March 2017.
Taking lessons from other shared service initiatives it was identified that one
of the key drivers for the success of this project is an appropriate single
software system around the Development Management functions (planning
applications).
3.2 There
are a limited number of software systems available in the market place. Based on discussions with other Shared
Planning Services it was estimated that the purchase of an entirely new
software system would cost in the order of £500,000, including project management
costs, a substantial investment. In
October 2017, (on a without prejudice basis) Idox
(current supplier to CCC since 2003), APAS (current supplier to SCDC) and
another potential supplier, DEF, were invited to present to the Joint Director,
representatives from 3C IT and the planning services at both authorities. This
aided the understanding of the principal systems currently available in the
market and their capabilities.
3.3 In
addition to this soft testing of the market, an independent consultant was commissioned
to undertake a GAP analysis in a review of the current two planning
systems. Neither current system was
found to provide the best customer experience or fully embraces the capacity
for agile, mobile and multi-site working, with both authorities still heavily
reliant on paper. Upgrading the current CCC system and adding the Enterprise
Module and extending use to SCDC in a single IT solution will optimise the
functionality of that solution. As Idox Uniform™ is embedded and linked in to other CCC
systems its continued use will allow continuity, and significantly minimise the
cost to CCC which would follow from the use of a new supplier, either Agile
APAS or DEF. The proposal is to provide Idox Uniform Enterprise ™ system at CCC, develop improved
work flow processes and undertake testing before data migration and roll out to
SCDC.
3.4 At
the earlier stage in the process of developing this proposal insufficient
information was available on the costs, procurement requirements and risks
involved for the project to be included in the CCC Capital Programme. The project has now been refined and the
procurement approach clarified.
Procurement of the software can be achieved from the CCS Framework,
without the need for the use of the OJEU process.
3.5 The key objectives
of the project have been identified as:
·
To provide improved and efficient workflow
systems
·
To provide a more effective performance
management system
·
To enable agile, mobile and multi-site
working
·
To facilitate a resilient and efficient
planning service across Cambridge City and South Cambridgeshire
·
To prepare for the efficient transfer and
merging of existing data from the two software systems for use in the preferred
system
3.6 Several risks for the project have been
identified, in particular, the 3C ICT and the CCC Capital Board were concerned
that there would be a shortfall in ICT project management resources available
because of the number of other major ICT projects under way. To mitigate it was
recommended that an additional £60,000 be allocated, shared equally between the
two Councils, in line with other project management costs, to ensure that a
resource is available.
4. Implications
(a) Financial
Implications
·
Opting for acquiring software which enables
existing links to other CCC systems to be retained has substantially reduced
the costs from the initial estimated costs of £500,000. However, working through
the procurement options led to a delay in bring forward a more detailed
and refined capital bid.
·
The total cost of the acquisition of the
software is £140,000. As with other
elements of Shared Services this is divided proportionally, in this case based
on the number of users so that the CCC cost will be £60,000 funded by capital receipt. However, the 3C ICT Board and CCC Project
Board identified the need for additional ICT Project Management Resource in the
light of quantity of other current ICT projects, at a cost of £60,000 to be
shared, as in the case of other project management costs, equally between the
two Councils, bringing the total cost to £200,000.-
£90,000 to CCC and £110,000 to SCDC.
·
The current planning software maintenance
budget is £15,915 per annum, although the invoice for 2018/2019 is £18,000. For
the five years of the contract maintenance costs will remain fixed at £12,880.
(b) Staffing Implications
There are no direct staffing implications
associated with this urgent decision.
(c) Equality and Poverty Implications
An Equalities Impact Assessment has been undertaken
in respect of this project and it is determined that it is low impact, with
potential benefit from the opportunity for remote and flexible working for
work/life balance and the need for appropriate staff training.
(d) Environmental Implications
An assessment of environmental implications
associated with this project identified a low positive potential for the
reduction in the need to travel resulting from the development of remote and
flexible working, and a reduction in the use of paper through more efficient
processes.
(e) Procurement
There are no direct procurement implications associated with this
project as the CCS Framework will be used.
(f) Consultation
and communication
There has been liaison and discussion with the key planning service
staff and the 3C ICT team.
(g) Community
Safety
There are no community safety implications
associated with this report.
4. Background
papers
There are no background papers used in the
preparation of this report:
5. Appendices
Appendix A - The Business Case Part A and B.
6. Inspection of Papers
To inspect the background papers or if you have a query on the report
please contact:
Author’s
Name: Stephen Kelly
Author’s Phone Number: 01223 457009
Author’s Email:
Stephen.Kelly@cambridge.gov.uk
Publication date: 19/03/2018
Date of decision: 19/03/2018