Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Decision details
Decision Maker: Executive Councillor for Housing
Decision status: Recommendations Approved
Is Key decision?: Yes
Is subject to call in?: No
The paper provides a framework within which the Council will deliver new housing itself.
This Item was chaired by Councillor Todd-Jones
Matter for
Decision
The advent of the Devolution Agreement means that the
Council could consider building new Council housing again. The report sought
endorsement of the housing dimension of the Devolution Agreement and set out
the development framework within which the Council would provide new housing
itself. It also provided details of the current delivery programme for using
Devolution Housing Grant over the following two years. The Council’s approach
to the involvement of residents in the process was refreshed as was the
Council’s Home Loss Policy.
Decision
of Executive Councillor for Housing
i.
Noted the Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Devolution New Homes
Business Case 20.1.17 Draft Version 10 at Appendix 1 of the Officer’s
report.
ii.
Approved the Council's approach to the development of new
Council housing as shown in the paper at Appendix 2 of the Officer’s report.
iii.
Approved the 'Commitment to Resident Involvement'.
iv.
Noted the current delivery programme for using Devolution
Housing Grant in Cambridge over the next two years as shown in Appendix 3 of
the Officer’s report.
v.
Re-approved the Home Loss Policy at Appendix 5 of the Officer’s report.
Reason for the Decision
As set out in the Officer’s report.
Any Alternative Options Considered and Rejected
Not applicable.
Scrutiny
Considerations
The Committee received a report from the Managing Director,
Housing Development Agency.
A correction to the text of the confidential document was
tabled and noted.
Councillor Todd-Jones proposed an amendment to the recommendations recommendation A. as follows (struck
through replaced with bold):
A.
Endorse Note the Cambridgeshire and Peterborough
Devolution New Homes Business Case 20.1.17 Draft Version 10 at Appendix 1.
The Committee unanimously approved amendment to
the recommendations.
The Committee
resolved unanimously to endorse the recommendations as amended.
The Executive Councillor approved the recommendations.
Conflicts of Interest Declared by the Executive Councillor (and any
Dispensations Granted)
No conflicts of interest
were declared by the Executive Councillor.
Publication date: 08/08/2017
Date of decision: 07/03/2017