Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Meeting attendance > Calendar > Committee attendance > Decision details
Decision Maker: Executive Councillor for Open Spaces and City Services
Decision status: Recommendations Approved
Is Key decision?: No
Is subject to call in?: No
To consider the introduction of a management regime for the regulation and enforcement of the City Council moorings based on civil contract law.
Matter for
Decision
The Officer’s report contained recommendations for amendments to, and
the management of, the Council’s visitor moorings.
The report summarised responses and also detailed issues and options that
have been raised by respondents to a recent consultation on the introduction of
a management regime for the regulation and enforcement of the City Council
moorings based on civil contract law.
Feedback received through responses to the consultation supported the
need for an effective enforcement policy for the efficient management of the
City Council’s River Moorings. As a
consequence of receiving and considering feedback through the consultation
process, officers’ propose changes and new recommendations.
Community Services Scrutiny Committee previously considered a report on
8th October 2015 that set out two options to regulate moorings to overcome the
current management issues; the civil possession claims for trespass to move on
unauthorised boaters, and a contractual approach based on the Oxford Model,
which sets out ‘licence’ terms that are a contract for the non-exclusive use of
a space for a period of time.
The Officer’s report made recommendations on continued formulation of a
regulation policy using contract law principles in addition to the current
civil possession claim for trespass.
Decision
of Executive Councillor for City Centre and Public
Places
Instructed officers to:
i.
Retain the existing provision of a free 48 hour
visitor mooring period, with no return for 7 days on designated moorings owned
by Cambridge City Council;
ii.
Establish and implement a management regime based
on civil ‘contract law’ as soon as practicably possible, that allows visitor
boats to be regulated and enforced within the existing resources of the
Council;
iii.
Work with Cam Boaters and the Cam Conservators on
the process and procedures required to support a Contract Law Model; and
iv.
Review the existing River Moorings Policy and
report back to Scrutiny Committee in October 2016.
Reason for the Decision
As set out in the Officer’s report.
Any Alternative Options Considered and Rejected
Not applicable.
Scrutiny
Considerations
The Committee received a report from the Streets and Open Spaces Development Manager. This was supplemented
with an addendum.
The addendum included an additional recommendation (shown in bold):
i.
To retain the existing provision of a free 48 hour
visitor mooring period, with no return for 7 days on designated moorings owned
by Cambridge City Council;
ii.
To establish and implement a management regime
based on civil ‘contract law’ as soon as practicable possible, that allows
visitor boats to be regulated and enforced within the existing resources of the
Council;
iii.
To work with Cam
Boaters and the Cam Conservators on the process and procedures required to
support a Contract Law Model; and
iv.
To review the existing River Moorings Policy and
report back to Scrutiny Committee in October 2016 further recommendations.
The Chair ruled that under 100B(4)(b) of the Local Government Act 1972
the addendum from the Streets and Open Spaces
Development Manager be considered despite not being made publicly available five clear days
prior to the meeting.
The reason that this document could not be deferred was that it was impracticable
to defer the decision until the next committee.
Liberal Democrat Councillors made the following comments in response to
the report and addendum:
i.
Expressed concern at rule-in of the addendum and
revised recommendations. Both documents were published late. There was
insufficient time for councillors and the public to read and scrutinise the
documents.
ii.
Expressed concerns about the moorings policy
process. It felt rushed. The Council should take more time to find a solution
with the boating community to tackle problems caused by a minority.
iii.
Requested the decision be deferred.
The Executive Councillor responded:
i.
The option to defer the
report had been considered.
ii.
The contract law principle
had come to committee before.
iii.
There were no material changes
to the report in the addendum, so there were no material reasons to defer it.
iv.
There was a need to
implement a sufficient deterrent (ability to take enforcement action) as soon
as possible. Delaying the report would delay implementation of enforcement
action for months until the next committee.
v.
The Executive Councillor had committed to the boating community 12-18
months ago that she would implement enforcement action, hence it coming to
committee now.
vi.
Undertook to work with Cam
Boaters to review any issues.
vii.
Approving the Officer
recommendations today would put signs/processes in place to protect those who
were licensed to use moorings. The intention was to tackle issues pre-summer
when demand for moorings increased.
Labour Councillors made the following comments in response to the report
and addendum:
i.
There had been
sufficient time to read the Officer’s report and addendum.
ii.
A decision should be
taken today so that an enforcement action policy could be implemented as soon
as possible. This would deter visitors from parking in residential moorings.
People who did this were unaware of the impact they had on others when
illegally parking in someone’s permanent mooring.
In response to Members’ questions the Executive Councillor said the
following:
i.
Visitors would be allowed
to stay for forty eight hours instead of six. Six hours was a provisional
figure that had been discounted.
ii.
People in long term liveables had been encouraged to sign up to the moorings
list, but not all had. The Council would work with Cam Boaters to ensure they
did not ‘slip through the net’ in policy terms, but some engagement was
required from the boating community so that a name appeared on the list at some
point.
In response to a Member’s question the Streets and Open Spaces Development Manager said the
issue of moorings for holiday hire boats would be addressed in future.
The Committee resolved by 4 votes to 2 to endorse the recommendations.
The Executive Councillor approved the recommendations.
Conflicts of Interest Declared by the Executive Councillor
(and any Dispensations Granted)
No conflicts of interest
were declared by the Executive Councillor.
Publication date: 05/05/2016
Date of decision: 17/03/2016