Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Decision details
Decision Maker: Executive Councillor for Transformation
Decision status: Recommendations Approved
Is Key decision?: No
Is subject to call in?: No
To note the report outlining options and risks associated with the implementation of an Ethical Investment Policy.
Matter for
decision
The report summarised the issues around developing an ethical investment
policy for inclusion in the Treasury Management Strategy and proposed wording
for such a policy.
Decision of the
Executive Councillor for Finance and Resources
i.
Approved the insertion of the following in
the Council’s 2015/16 Treasury Management Strategy
“Cambridge
City Council notes the risks to both the planet and Cambridge from climate change
and the need to show leadership in advocating a fossil-free future, including
its investments. Where consistent with our fiduciary responsibilities the
Council will avoid direct investment in institutions with material links to
environmentally harmful activities including fossil fuels.
Cambridge
city Council, in making investments through its treasury management function,
full supports the ethos of socially responsible investments. We will actively
seek to communicate this support to those institutions we invest in as well as
those we are considering investing by:
·
Encouraging those institutions to adopt and
publicise policies on socially responsible investments.
·
Requesting those institutions to apply those
deposits in a socially responsible manner.
Counterparties will be advised of this
statement”.
Reason for the
Decision
As set out in the Officer’s report.
Any Alternative
Options Considered and Rejected
Not applicable.
Scrutiny
Considerations
The Committee received a report from the Head of Finance who made the
following comments:
i.
The Council invested in building societies.
ii.
There was guidance that the Council had to
comply with in relation to investments which included the security, liquidity
and yield of the investment.
iii.
It would be difficult to measure ethical
considerations.
The Committee discussed what a socially irresponsible investment might
be and discussed, as an example, Shell in Nigeria.
In response to Members questions the Head of Finance confirmed the
following:
i.
The Council did not invest in equity or
corporate bonds.
ii.
Regarding the investments discussed by the
Committee, for example Shell in Nigeria, there would be financial arguments for
the Council not investing rather than ethical reasons.
The Committee unanimously resolved to endorse the recommendations.
The Executive Councillor for Finance and Resources approved the
recommendations.
Conflicts of
Interest Declared by the Executive Councillor for Finance and Resources (and
any Dispensations Granted):
Not applicable.
Publication date: 01/04/2016
Date of decision: 18/01/2016