Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Decision details
Decision Maker: Leader of the Council
Decision status: Recommendations Approved
Is Key decision?: Yes
Is subject to call in?: No
The report will include the business case and operating model for the proposed shared service and will outline the stages required to implement it. As the lead authority it will also detail the arrangements for staff from HDC and SCDC to TUPE into the City Council.
Matter for
Decision
Cambridge City Council
(CCC), Huntingdonshire District Council (HDC) and South Cambridgeshire District
Council (SCDC) had agreed to work in partnership to deliver shared services and
had agreed general principles to underpin the approach.
The report provided the
business case to establish a Shared Legal Service (to be known as the Practice)
between the Councils and detailed the activity to create the Practice.
Decision
of the Leader
Approved the Business Case and delegate authority to the Director of
Business Transformation to make decisions and to take steps which are
necessary, conducive or incidental to the establishment of the Practice in
accordance with the business case.
Reason for the Decision
As set out in the Officer’s report.
Any Alternative Options Considered and Rejected
Not applicable.
Scrutiny
Considerations
The Committee received a report from the Director of Business Transformations regarding Shared Legal Services.
The Committee made the following comments in response to the report:
i.
Expressed concerns that a permanent Head of Service
had not been appointed to shape the services.
ii.
Suggested that protocols regarding which tasks were
to be outsourced to an external provider needed to be in place soon.
In response to Members’ questions the Director of Business
Transformation stated that:
i.
Appointing a permanent Head of Service at this
point would have delayed the project. Consultations regarding the management
team structure and operating model were on-going.
ii.
The Interim Head of Service had the capacity to get
the initial tasks completed.
iii.
The larger team would result in a broader range of
in house services being available.
iv.
The Interim Head of Service would have line
management function for the three teams.
v.
The existing close working relationship between
City Legal and Planning Teams would be maintained.
vi.
Procurement would not be a shared service.
The Committee resolved unanimously to endorse the recommendation.
The Executive Councillor
approved the recommendation.
Publication date: 08/09/2015
Date of decision: 13/07/2015