Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Decision details
Decision Maker: East Area Committee
Decision status: Recommendations Approved
Is Key decision?: No
Is subject to call in?: No
To note the arrangements for the third round S106 priority-setting process in late 2014/early 2015.
The Committee received a report from the Urban Growth
Project Manager regarding S106 priority-setting and devolved decision-making.
In response to member’s questions, the Urban Growth Project
Manager said the following:
i.
Preparations for taking forward the Bath House
play area improvement project had identified the potential for a better way to
utilise the space. Further scoping work was therefore required by officers
before the project could progress (and it was possible that some further
funding might be needed for this project).
ii.
The design development and consultation for the Romsey ‘Town Square’ project was under way. The project is
not expected to be completed until autumn 2015 because there are some legal
issues need to be agreed.
iii.
Streets and Open Spaces officers will be asked
to give Romsey local councillors more details of the
design of the Romsey ‘Town Square’ project and an update
on the Cavendish Road project (involving improved seating and pacing, as well
as public art).
iv.
Further advice for local groups seeking
grant-funding was available on the city council’s Developer Contributions web
page (www.cambrige.gov.uk/s106).
More details of the S106 grant-funding application process will also be made
available on this page.
v.
Following an application process for S106
grant-funding (from early November 2014), officers would then assess the
eligibility, viability and practicality of any proposals for grant-funding.
Links to Council policies and strategies would also be highlighted. Officers
from Community, Arts and Recreation were helping to finalise the arrangements
for the applications and assessment processes.
vi.
S106 developer contributions funding is set to
taper off and run down in future, in the context of the introduction of the
Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL) system.
vii.
The process for the 3rd and 4th
S106 priority-setting rounds (as detailed at Appendix C of the officer’s
report) will be simpler than in previous rounds – with priority-setting
decisions being made in a single meeting. As part of this, councillors from
each ward will be asked to identify the short-listed proposals for their ward
at the start of that priority-setting discussion.
In response to member’s questions the Executive Councillor
for City Centre and Public Places said the following:
i.
It was important that additional scoping work be
undertaken to ensure that the Bath House Play Area project was a success. Ditton Fields play provision could be looked at as an
alternative if it became apparent in future that the Bath House play area
project was no longer viable.
ii.
Councillors would be given access to the S106
project updates, which would be posted on the council’s Developer Contributions
web page (www.cambridge.gov.uk/s106)
in due course.
iii.
Bringing together S106 funding from across the
city for indoor sports, public art and public realm (with a separate ‘pot’ per
contribution type) would help to ensure that more projects could be delivered.
Local communities would retain a voice in the process through the consultation
and/or application processes.
iv.
In order to manage public expectations it was
important to deliver the S106 projects already prioritised before adding more
to the list.
Councillor Robertson spoke strongly in support of
progressing with the original Bath House play area improvement project.
The Executive Councillor for City Centre and Public Places
confirmed that she was in email correspondence with ward councillors and local
residents regarding an improved project.
The Executive Councillor offered to meet with Councillor
Robertson outside the meeting to discuss this in more detail.
Councillor Baigent and Councillor Moghadas expressed
frustration with the lack of progress on the Romsey
Town Square and Cavendish Road projects.
The Executive Councillor agreed to provide a full update to
Councillors Baigent and Moghadas outside the meeting.
The Committee:
Resolved
(unanimously):
i.
To note the proposed arrangements for the third and
fourth priority-setting rounds in 2014/15 and 2015/16.
ii.
To note the progress being made on S106-funded
projects that had been prioritised by the East Area Committee in 2012/13 and
2013/14.
Report author: Tim Wetherfield
Publication date: 19/03/2015
Date of decision: 23/10/2014
Decided at meeting: 23/10/2014 - East Area Committee
Accompanying Documents: