Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Decision details
Decision Maker: Executive Councillor for Planning, Building Control, and Infrastructure
Decision status: Recommendations Approved
Is Key decision?: Yes
Is subject to call in?: No
Consider future options for the car park.
Public Question
A member of the public asked a question as set out below.
Mr Lucas-Smith raised the
following points:
i.
Referred
to the Cambridge Cycling Campaign representation.
ii.
Said
that Park Street Cycle Park could be a success, this was an opportunity to
install secure parking facilities and more space for bikes.
iii.
Took
issue with the consultation process.
iv.
The cost
of congestion should be considered.
The Executive Councillor for Planning Policy and Transport said bike and
car parking would be included in the improvement work.
Matter for
Decision
A report examining viable options for the
future of Park Street multi-storey car park was presented to members in June
2012. It considered the outline business case for refurbishing the car park and
examined the potential and implications of alternative redevelopment of the
site.
The report found that due to the deteriorating
structural condition of the car park, it could not be left in its current
state.
The Executive Councillor’s recommendations
included an agreement to the principle of consulting the public and
stakeholders about the options to refurbish, or to redevelop the Park Street
car park. Authority was delegated to the Director of Environment in
consultation with the Executive Councillor to carry out a public consultation
exercise to determine the best option and report the results to the Council in
due course.
A public consultation exercise was conducted
between 18 August and 19 September 2014.
In light of the consultation feedback, a
detailed appraisal of the alternative options should now be carried out. The
appraisal should recommend an option to members that is consistent with the
council’s economic, financial environmental and planning objectives, so that
the project can be incorporated into the council’s future budget.
Decision
of Executive Councillor for Planning Policy and Transport
i.
Noted and considered the feedback and analysis from
the public and business consultation exercise.
ii.
Instructed officers to work up detailed financial
evaluation of the options and taking account of the consultation feedback
against the objectives set out in this report.
iii.
Instructed officers to report back to a future
meeting of the Environment Scrutiny Committee to enable a decision to be made
on the preferred option for inclusion in the Council’s budget.
Reason for the Decision
As set out in the Officer’s report.
Any Alternative Options Considered and Rejected
Not applicable.
Scrutiny
Considerations
The Committee received a report from the Head of Specialist Services.
The Committee made the following comments in response to the report:
i.
The car park should be redeveloped.
ii.
Suggested that Stagecoach could be asked to
re-instate Madingley Road bus stops.
iii.
Requested Park&Ride services be temporarily
changed to operate late at night during refurbishment work to the car park so
people could commute to the theatre etc was the car park was unavailable.
In response to Members’ questions the Head of Specialist Services said the following:
i.
There was no firm commitment regarding the
design at present, only that cycle parking facilities would be provided.
ii.
Consultation responses had been received from
the Cambridge Cycling Campaign plus individual cyclists and businesses.
The Executive Councillor for Planning Policy
and Transport said the consultation was open to all, it was up to people to
respond.
iii.
Several options were set out in the Officer’s report for
Councillor consideration as it was prudent to make Councillors aware of all
options.
iv.
Changes to bus services were a key consideration
for discussion with the County Council. Other providers may be able to make
alternative parking spaces available if Park Street was not.
v.
The City Council worked with Cambridge BID to
interact with businesses.
The Committee unanimously resolved to endorse the recommendations.
The Executive Councillor approved the recommendations.
He said the logistics for options needed to be looked at (eg traffic flow to
the site) to ensure they were practicable.
Conflicts of Interest Declared by the Executive Councillor (and any
Dispensations Granted)
No conflicts of interest were
declared by the Executive Councillor.
Publication date: 01/12/2014
Date of decision: 17/10/2014