Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Decision details
Decision Maker: Executive Councillor for Communities.
Decision status: Recommendations Approved
Is Key decision?: No
Is subject to call in?: No
To authorise s106 contribution and entry into a community use agreement with ARU.
Matter for
Decision
Anglia Ruskin
University (ARU) were proposing redevelop of their Howe’s Place sports ground
facility off Huntingdon Road.
The nearby site of
Darwin Green was a major growth development area, and part of the development was
being built upon Sidney Sussex playing fields. This part of the Darwin Green
proposal received objections from Sport England which had to be mitigated to
allow the whole site to be approved. These mitigations were adopted into the
S106 Agreement for Darwin Green for the loss of sporting facilities and playing
pitches and a specific ring fenced sum of £250,000 was agreed for offsite
contribution to improve local sports facilities and pitches but were restricted
to only being able to be spent in the four neighbouring wards or within 1 mile
of the City Boundary.
It was proposed
that the ring fenced £250,000 of developer contributions are invested into the
ARU sports pavilion building.
Decision
of Executive Councillor for Community, Arts and Recreation
The
Executive Councillor resolved to:
i.
approve the release of £250,000 of developer
contributions derived from the Darwin Green - 14/0086/REM -
Sidney Sussex playing fields development towards the ARU development of sports
pitches and ancillary facilities at Howe’s Place – (subject to South
Cambridgeshire District Council planning approval being granted for the
application) and add to Capital Plan for 2015/16; and
ii.
authorise
Officers to enter into a Community Use agreement to secure public access to the
Howe’s Place facilities based on the provisions in 3.11 of the Officer’s report
to be agreed by the Executive Councillor, in consultation with the Chair and
Spokes.
Reason for the Decision
As set out in the Officer’s report.
Any Alternative Options Considered and Rejected
Not applicable.
Scrutiny
Considerations
The Committee received a report from the Sports and Recreation Manager and noted the additional wording to be
added to recommendation 2.1 of the Officer’s report as follows: and add to the Capital Plan for 2014/15.
The Committee made the following comments in response to the report:
i.
Concerns were expressed that problems experienced
with similar schemes elsewhere in the City would be repeated if the Community Use
Agreement was not tight enough and backed up with promotional material.
ii.
Some Members were concerned about delegating the
final decision regarding the Community Use Agreement to officers without any
further opportunity to review it.
Councillor Reid Proposed the following
amendment to recommendation 2.2. The following additional working to be added: to be agreed by the Executive Councillor
in consultation with the Chair and Spokes.
The amendment was agreed unanimously.
In response to Members’ questions the Sports and Recreation Manager clarified the following:
iii.
The pricing structure would be agreed by the
management group and would be set at a level which would ensure local residents
were not priced out.
iv.
It was anticipated that local schools would be
encouraged to use the facilities in the day time.
v.
An outreach programme was planned to promote the
use of the facilities to local communities.
vi.
Officers
vii.
In response to concerns expressed about the 12 year
repayment plan if ARU decided to exit from the agreement, officers confirmed
that this was in line with other S106 agreements.
Councillor Austin was concerned that
football was the dominant sport being offered and wondered why there was not
more provision for other sport in the proposal. The Head of Arts and Recreation
undertook to provide members with an update of other sports provision agreed
for the Darwin Green site, which would address such concerns.
The Committee resolved unanimously to endorse the amended
recommendations.
The Executive Councillor
approved the recommendations.
Publication date: 12/11/2014
Date of decision: 16/10/2014