Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Decision details
Decision Maker: South Area Committee
Decision status: Recommendations Approved
Is Key decision?: No
Is subject to call in?: No
Advise on the priorities to be adopted for the next period of Neighbourhood Policing.
The Committee
received a report from Police Sergeant Horton regarding policing and safer
neighbourhoods trends.
The report
outlined actions taken since the Committee on 23 June 2014. The current
emerging issues/neighbourhood trends for each ward were also highlighted (see
report for full details). Previous priorities and engagement activity noted in
the report were:
i.
Combat the supply of drugs in the South area.
ii.
Target dwelling burglary in the Cherry Hinton and Trumpington wards.
iii.
Target ASB associated with the “Cambridge Lakes”
area.
The Committee discussed the following
policing issues:
i.
Drug dealing and drug use affecting Trumpington and Queen Edith’s Wards. Also associated
anti-social behaviour eg dumping of needles in Queen Edith’s
Ward.
ii.
Links between alcohol/drugs and violent crime.
iii.
Breakdown
of statistics in police area committee reports to help set priorities. The
Sergeant undertook to provide these in future reports.
iv.
Work to reduce cycle crime across the city. This could be covered under the umbrella of
road safety to address various issues including criminality.
v.
Home
safety and crime prevention initiatives across the city, with particular
focus on Queen Edith’s Ward.
In response to Members’ questions the Sergeant
answered:
i.
Financial investigations
were routinely undertaken when money was seized after drugs busts.
ii.
Burglary was not
recommended as a priority. There had been a spike in figures (agenda page 19
due to historic issues that had been addressed).
iii.
The Police had not mapped
if dwelling burglaries had occurred in areas without street lighting eg where it had been taken away. They would consider doing
so in future.
iv.
It was a political decision
by councilors where/not to have street lighting.
v.
Domestic violence was
included in violent crime figures. A rise may have occurred due to increased reporting
and the growth in numbers of dwelling in the city. A future breakdown of
figures may help address this.
vi.
There was no quantifiable
link between youth unemployment and violent crime. Repeat offending was more of
an issue, the intention was to carry on with early intervention work.
Members of the public made statements and asked a number of
questions, as set out below.
1. Mr Bower supported work to reduce cycle crime across the
city.
2. Mr John asked why violent crime was not recommended as a
police priority.
Sergeant Horton
said that violent crime was always treated as a serious issue. The breakdown of
statistics in future would allow SAC to target particular issues/areas.
Sergeant Horton requested
a change to the recommendations. He proposed adding road safety to priority 3:
· Address cycling
offences with the return of students and darker evenings (will compliment
effort against cycle crime and road
safety).
The amendment was agreed nem con.
The following priorities were unanimously agreed:
i.
Continue work against Class A dealers.
ii.
Address cycle crime in response to citywide spike.
iii.
Address cycling offences with the return of
students and darker evenings (will compliment effort against cycle crime and
road safety).
iv.
Dwelling burglary
Publication date: 12/11/2014
Date of decision: 13/10/2014
Decided at meeting: 13/10/2014 - South Area Committee
Accompanying Documents: