Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Decision details
Decision Maker: Executive Councillor for Open Spaces and City Services
Decision status: Recommendations approved
Is Key decision?: Yes
Is subject to call in?: No
To agree the preferred direction for the service to develop and approve work to develop a detailed business case.
Matter for
Decision
The report considered future service delivery options for Bereavement
Services in Cambridge, in the context of the Councils strategic objectives and
its savings targets. A set of key principles for the design of the service and
relevant financial objectives were set out.
Different organisational changes were considered, ranging
from ‘no change’ to the current operational model to outright disposal of the
service. It is proposed that moving the service onto a trading account and
introducing a pricing strategy will best meet the Council’s financial and
policy objectives. On the basis of this
recommendation a detailed business case will be developed, for further
consideration and approval in the next budget round.
Decision
of Executive Councillor for City Centre and Public Places
The Executive
Councillor resolved:
i.
to consider the options set out in the report
and the financial projections for the service;
ii.
to approve in principle, on the basis of the
outline business case, a proposal for bereavement services that moves the
service onto a trading account, in which surpluses over and above the required
return to the General Fund can be ring-fenced for reinvestment in the service
infrastructure; and
iii.
to approve the
development of a detailed pricing strategy and coherent plan that will be
brought back to members to consider in October 2014.
Reason for the Decision
As set out in the Officer’s report.
Any Alternative Options Considered and Rejected
Not applicable.
Scrutiny
Considerations
The Committee received a report from the Head of Specialist Services.
The Committee made the following comments in response to the report:
i.
Expressed concern that ring fencing funding could
result in a shortfall in the future.
ii.
Suggested that the services would need to evolve in
future.
iii.
Suggested that predicting future death rates was
problematic.
In response to Members’ questions the Head of Specialist Services stated that:
iv.
The service would need to become more business
focused in future.
v.
Ring fencing of funding could be reversed in future
if circumstances changed.
The Committee resolved unanimously to endorse the recommendation.
The Executive Councillor
approved the recommendation.
Publication date: 22/08/2014
Date of decision: 11/07/2014