Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Decision details
Decision Maker: East Area Committee
Decision status: Recommendations Approved
Is Key decision?: No
Is subject to call in?: No
Discussion of results from Public Consultation, approval to progress with scheme.
The Committee received a report from the Project Delivery and Environment Manager regarding the
Cambridge 20mph Project. It was noted that a capital bid for £600,000 (not
£400,000 as indicated in 3.1 of the Officer’s report) to cover the project was agreed
in February 2012.
1.
Mr Storer,
speaking on behalf of the Cambridge Cycling Campaign, welcomed speed reduction
on Mill Road but had reservations regarding Cherry Hinton Road and Coldham’s
Lane if the new limits were not enforced.
Concern was raised
regarding rat running through residential areas in Romsey and Coleridge. The
need for more cycle access only areas and more traffic calming measures was
also highlighted.
Noted
2.
Mr Woodburn
highlighted the number of road deaths on Cherry Hinton Road and urged
Councillor to support a 20mph limit. Children used this area when accessing
local schools, as did older people accessing the two local pharmacies.
The need to replace the speed camera was also reiterated and
Councillors and the Police were invited to observe the issues with Mr Woodburn.
Noted
3.
Mr Dunn raised
concern at the high cost of the project and questioned how it would be enforced
by the Police. Everyone had a responsibility for their own safety and many
cyclists in the City were badly behaved.
He felt that Ward
Councillors were forcing this through.
In response to the public questions Councillors made the following
points:
i.
Councillor Smart confirmed that the 20mph project,
via a Motion at Full Council, received unanimous support from all Councillors
present. However, Ward Councillors should not agree without the support of
local residents.
ii.
Councillor Brown responded that if Coldham’s Lane
residents were not in support of a 20mph limit it made no sense to agree it.
Cherry Hinton Road was dangerous but without a speed camera in place a 20mph
speed limit would not be observed.
iii.
Councillor Herbert confirmed that he would be happy
to meet Mr Woodburn on Cherry Hinton Road to observe the speeding issues.
Support was expressed for a 20mph limit and speed reduction measures on
Coleridge Road.
iv.
Councillor Benstead expressed support for a 20mph
limit on both Cherry Hinton Road and Coleridge Road. He would also be
interested in a breakdown of the consultation results (long term resident’s vs rental properties) for Cherry Hinton Road.
v.
Councillor Roberts requested a breakdown of the
consultation results for Wadloes Road.
The Project Delivery and Environment Manager agreed to provide this to
Councillor Roberts.
vi.
Councillor Owers agreed that
speeding on Cherry Hinton Road was an issue and expressed support for a 20mph
limit.
vii.
Councillor Saunders confirmed that he would support
the results of the public consultation.
Resolved (unanimously) to:
i.
Note the consultation outcomes.
ii.
Recommend to the Executive Councillor for Planning
and Climate change (Councillor Tim Ward) and the Environment Scrutiny Committee
the introduction of a 20mph limit on the unclassified roads in the East Phase
area.
iii.
Recommend to the Executive Councillor for Planning
and Climate change (Councillor Tim Ward) and the Environment Scrutiny Committee
the introduction of a 20mph limit on the following C Class roads within the
East Phase area:
-
Mill Road
-
Brookside
Resolved (by 6 votes to 2)
to:
iv.
Recommend to the Executive Councillor for Planning
and Climate change (Councillor Tim Ward) and the Environment Scrutiny Committee
the introduction of a 20mph limit on the following C Class road within the East
Phase area:
-
Cherry Hinton Road
Resolved (unanimously) to:
v.
Recommend to the Executive Councillor for Planning
and Climate change (Councillor Tim Ward) and the Environment Scrutiny Committee
not to introduce a 20mph limit
Coldham’s Lane.
Report author: Paul White
Publication date: 23/04/2014
Date of decision: 10/04/2014
Decided at meeting: 10/04/2014 - East Area Committee
Accompanying Documents: