Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Decision details
Decision Maker: West Central Area Committee
Decision status: Recommendations Approved
Is Key decision?: No
Is subject to call in?: No
Advise on the priorities to be adopted for the next period of Neighbourhood Policing.
The Committee received a report from Inspector Poppit regarding policing and safer neighbourhood trends.
The report outlined actions taken since the West Central
Area Committee of the 5 September 2013. The current emerging issues/neighbourhood trends for
each ward were also highlighted (see report for full details).
Community Fire Safety Officer Meikle reported
the number of blue bags had been reduced and it was business as usual.
Members’ Comments:
Councillor Reiner queried whether the Police could initiate as part of their priorities a project for road safety specifically for school age children during the busy school run period.
Councillor Cantrill stated that there was a broader set of issues concerning road safety, suggesting road users needed to think about other road users and the impact that their actions had. He then suggested including motorists being ticketed for straying into cycle stop boxes at junctions as part of the wider road safety priority.
Councillor Kightley suggested that motorists should also be ticketed for entering on to the hatch areas on the road when their exits were not clear.
Councillor
Nethsingha passed on her thanks to the enforcement team whose work had made a
difference to the parking outside schools for the school drop off.
Councillor Nethsingha brought to the Committee’s attention the lack of
secondary school children who wear helmets when cycling. With the Tour de
France coming to the City this could be the perfect opportunity to help change
the culture.
Councillor Cantrill stated that
Cambridgeshire County grants were available of up to £500 to local groups to
support activities or events linked to cycling or the Tour de France which
could be linked to safety.
The Director of Customer and Community Services
acknowledged that the Tour de France was an opportunity to link the promotion
of wearing safety helmets and would reference the discussion to the Tour de
France working party.
Councillor Rosenstiel queried the safety
implications of helmets and then went on
to specify that cycle theft and crime prevention
needed to be strengthened. The City Council were increasing the cycle parking
provision but the Police needed to
advise those residents who had their bikes stolen that their cycles
needed to be locked to something.
The
Committee were reminded of the surgeries held by the PCO’s where residents were
advised on how to look after their cycles.
The Chair then invited members of the public to address the
Police:
1) Mr
Richard Taylor
The Police report referred to
electronic alerts as way of communication with local neighbourhoods could you
please explain how this works.
With the Police exploring the
possibility of how they utilise the Cambridge ShapeYourPlace
website, will there still be a forum to allow people to make suggestions in the
public space?
Inspector
Poppit advised that the Neighbourhood Alert has replaced e-cops which allow a
broader subject matter in of crime and crime prevention. Anyone who is registered will receive an alert.
The system
provides an enhanced service to Neighbourhood Watch
coordinators. With regards to ShapeYourPlace
he would like to see the website used as an engagement tool for the City.
2) Mr Richard
Taylor
At the last West /
Central Area Committee meeting I asked if the Police could include in their
report how, when and where Tasers were being used in Cambridge.
Could the Police
comment on the recruitment of a Cambridge University student to spy on those
students who were members of the Student Union. Who is the current Police University Liaison
Officer as they really need to understand how the University is run and the
role of the Student Union.
Inspector Poppit advised that no Police representatives at the meeting
had a Taser. It would be wrong to give out any operational details on the use
of Tasers. Officers who use Tasers would have undertaken the relevant training
and were assessed on a regular basis. The Professional Standard Department
review what the police do and deal with any complaints.
Inspector
Poppit stated that he would be the Senior Officer who
manages the University Liaison Officer; PC Simon Railer,
who had held the post of University Liaison Officer (for both Cambridge
University and Anglian Ruskin) for approximately three years and had built good
working relationship and understanding with both Universities
3) Mrs Hardcastle
& Mr Russell
Item 3 of the Police and Neighbourhood profile report refers to
City Councillor’s ASB Officers who had been contacted by residents of Radcliffe
Court in Market Ward regarding youths gaining access to the private terraces
within the complex. Working in partnership with the police and the property
company, the issue had now been resolved. We wish to inform the Committee that
we dispute this statement and the issue was still on going.
Mr Russell then spoke at
length at the problems that he had encountered on a continuous basis and the
affect that this had.
The Safer Communities
Section Manager advised Mr Russell that as the problem had stopped being
reported, it had been anticipated the issue was resolved. It was agreed to talk
to Mrs Hardcastle and Mr Russell outside of the meeting with the Police to
discuss how the situation could be moved forward.
Councillor Rosenstiel explained that support was required from the
neighbouring business in ensuring that roof access was secure.
Councillor Nethsingha
requested a follow up to actions that had been undertaken following the
discussion with Mrs Hardcastle and Mr Russell.
Councillor Smith asked if
there was a general problem of roof running or was this in a specific area as
discussed tonight. The Safer Communities Manager advised that this issue should
be treated separately to that of the police priorities.
4) Mr John Lawton
I would like to remind Members of the
statement that was made at the previous meeting of the West / Central Area
Committee. Would the Committee consider in advance of the next West / Central
Area meeting when Police priorities will be set, adding enforcement of the
20mph speed limit specifically in Maids Causeway, Newmarket Road, but also, not
limited to adjoining streets such as Jesus Lane and Emmanuel Road?
Inspector Poppit replied that it was very much an operation
that the Police supported and could be incorporated into the wider area of road
safety and would be based on risk. There were now speed awareness courses for
those drivers who were caught breaking the speed limit in a 20 mph zone.
The Committee:
Resolved (unanimously) to prioritise the following:
1. Wider road safety priority ensuring better road safety for all road
users focusing on the following:
i.
Children’s road safety, particularly targeting
areas around the Schools during peak times.
ii.
Cycling in the City.
iii.
Ticketing all road users when stationary that
encroached on designated no waiting areas, motorists straying into cycle stop
boxes at junctions and cross hatchings.
iv.
Focusing on speed enforcement in risk areas,
including the 20 mph zones in the City.
v.
Over ranking of the taxis.
2. To continue to tackle ASB in the city.
Report author: Lynda Kilkelly
Publication date: 04/03/2014
Date of decision: 09/01/2014
Decided at meeting: 09/01/2014 - West Central Area Committee
Accompanying Documents: