Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Decision details
Decision Maker: Leader of the Council
Decision status: Recommendations Approved
Is Key decision?: Yes
Is subject to call in?: No
To approve proposed charges for 2014/15, and to recommend to the Executive revenue budget proposals, capital funding requests, rephasing and changes to the Capital and Revenue Projects Plan.
Matter
for Decision: The report detailed the budget proposals which relate to this portfolio
that are included in the Budget-Setting Report (BSR) 2014/15. The report also included
any recommendations concerning the review of charges, project appraisals and
capital re-phasing / funding for schemes in the Capital & Revenue Projects
Plan for this portfolio.
Decision of the Leader
The Leader resolved to:
Capital:
a)
Seek approval from the Executive to fund the
additional spend of £3k in 2013/14 from the Climate Change Fund, as detailed in
Appendix C of the Officer’s report.
Reasons for the
Decision: As set out in the Officer’s report
Any alternative
options considered and rejected: As set out in the Officer’s report
Scrutiny
Considerations:
The committee received a report from the Director of
Resources.
In response to member’s questions the Director of Resources
and the Director of Environment said the following:
i.
The capital contribution of £111,140 to the
‘Keep Cambridge Moving’ is a top up in order to meet the total investment of
£1.5m.
ii.
Any final decision on how to spend the £1.5m
would need to be brought to the Environment Scrutiny Committee and discussed in
detail with the County Council. As an example however, it could pay for 350-500
additional Park and Ride spaces, or be used as a strategic intervention to
address issues such as the Huntingdon Road Corridor.
iii.
£25,000 was spent on the District Heating System
Pilot but unfortunately the business case has not been proved and the funding
has therefore been cancelled. Lots of work was undertaken with the University
to look at the financial viability but unfortunately the rate of return was
lower than anticipated and it was deemed too risky to proceed. Good dialogue
has been built up between the Council and the University and future joint
projects are being investigated. A full report on the District Heating Scheme
Pilot will be brought back to committee in due course.
iv.
As a result of the creation of a shared CCTV
service some surplus balance from Repairs and Renewal (R&R) has been
returned. This is made up of a number of different components such as a
reduction in the number of posts, and the reduction in maintenance and running
of the control room and related equipment.
In response to member’s questions the Leader said the
following:
i.
The aim of the ‘keep Cambridge Moving’ fund is
to meet future transport demands and mitigate against
the extra traffic coming into the City due to the improvements to the A14.
ii.
The £1.5 investment is not a contribution to the
A14 improvements.
iii.
The aim of the City Council is to prioritise
sustainable forms of transport.
iv.
The fund would not be a grant pot for which
projects could be bid against. The fund would most likely support a small
number of significant projects delivered alongside the County Council.
v.
Whilst the Council could have chosen to invest
into the fund on an annual basis, the larger upfront investment was deemed the
best option to address the particular issues that Cambridge faces.
vi.
The
Neighbourhood Resolution Panel Co-ordinator’s hours have been increased in
order to deliver on the turnaround time target for the completion of the panel
process and to replenish and train the pool of volunteers.
The committee resolved by 4 votes to 0 to endorse the
recommendations.
The Leader approved the recommendation.
Conflicts of Interest Declared by the Leader (and any Dispensations
Granted):
Not applicable.
Publication date: 10/02/2014
Date of decision: 20/01/2014