Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Decision details
Decision Maker: Leader of the Council
Decision status: Recommendations Approved
Is Key decision?: No
Is subject to call in?: No
To confirm the continued involvement of the Council in the partnership based on an informed view of its added value and achievements.
Matter
for Decision: The report gave a feel for
the direction that partnerships are moving in, their developing priorities and
other associated work, notably the developing Greater Cambridge City Deal. It
is part of a commitment given in the Council’s “Principles of Partnership Working” that the Council’s lead member provides an annual
account of their work.
Decision of the Leader
The Leader resolved to:
i.
Continue
to work with the partnerships (LEP and Cambridge Community Safety Partnership) and
the development of the Greater Cambridge City Deal, to ensure that the
strategic issues affecting Cambridge and matters of concern to Cambridge
citizens are responded to. This includes maintaining the economic success of
our area, whilst respecting its unique character, and continuing to address and
prevent incidents of anti-social behaviour and crime.
Reasons for the
Decision: As set out in the Officer’s report
Any alternative
options considered and rejected: As set out in the Officer’s report
Scrutiny
Considerations:
The committee received a report from the Head of Corporate
Strategy.
Mr Grahame Nix addressed the committee and made the
following comments:
i.
Thanked the committee for the opportunity to
attend the meeting.
ii.
Thanked the Leader of the Council for his input
into the LEP.
iii.
Highlighted the important relationship between
local authorities and the LEP.
iv.
13 local authorities from a complex geographical
area feed into the LEP.
v.
The LEP had consulted widely, with both partners
and the general public, on its Strategic Economic Plan (SEP).
vi.
Over 300 project ideas had been formulated
through the SEP consultation.
vii.
A range of Sub-Groups have also been involved in
formulating ideas and these have now been grouped thematically.
viii.
A LEP Summit, attended by over 130 people, had
been held to feedback on the ideas generated.
ix.
Themes included:
-
Becoming a UK exemplar for digital technologies
and developments.
-
Accelerating business growth.
-
Increasing the options for exporting businesses
and ideas.
-
Responding to growth and ensuring innovation
space is available to facilitate this.
-
Removing the skills barriers to ensure the
continuation of growth.
-
Encouraging better transport networks.
-
Enabling the development and occupation of the Alconbury Enterprise Zone.
x.
The government has encouraged LEPs to:
-
Prioritise around no more than 5 key asks
-
Develop ambitious ideas and have a strong
vision.
-
Ensure the money allocated in 2015 can be spent
within that year.
xi.
A list of
priority project ideas has been discussed by the LEP Board.
xii.
As part
of the SEP we have bid for £389m over 5 years. Targets for the first year
include:
-
£5m for digital technologies and developments.
-
£40m for transport network improvements.
-
£5 for education and skills provision.
-
£10 for commercial property provision.
-
£15m to help facilitate growth.
xiii.
Feedback on the SEP bid should be received this
week, but further negotiations are expected.
xiv.
A European Structural Investment (ESI) Fund of
£72m is also available to the LEP, with match funding from the government. This
has been prioritised:
ERDF
-
40% for Innovation.
-
10% for ICT
-
20% for supporting SMEs
-
30% for Low Carbon
SF
-
40% for Skills
-
40% for Employability
-
20% for Social Inclusion
1.
The LEP
are in the process of finalising their ESI bid and the outcome should be
announced in February.
The committee thanked Mr Nix for attending, and made the
following comments:
i.
Welcomed improvements to education and training
provision to better meet the needs of local businesses.
ii.
Hoped that the LEP would look favourably on some
of the projects brought forward for the City.
iii.
Welcomed the work of the LEP.
In response to member’s questions Mr Nix said the following:
i.
Cambridge has a very clear skill set and the LEP
are keen to promote and assist with this.
ii.
The LEP have launched a new Skills Survey to
better understand the complex skills and training needs of local businesses.
iii.
The Alconbury
Enterprise Zone gives huge potential for extra jobs.
iv.
Some examples of project ideas include:
-
Retro-fit.
-
Northern fringe and new station area
development.
v.
At the moment SEP is ‘thematic’ and there is not
a list of detailed projects.
vi.
The bid from Cambridge for Retro-fit fits into
the EU framework for this fund.
vii.
The LEP works closely with local colleges and an
educational representative sits on the Skills Strategy Sub-Group.
viii.
A challenge for the colleges is the critical
mass for certain skill set areas.
ix.
The Skills Survey will pick up any additional
areas that the LEP need to concentrate on.
In response to member’s questions the Leader said the
following:
i.
The bid for a shop front for the Rainbow Savers
Credit Union is a joint project idea supported by both the City Council and
County Council. It will target the ESI fund under the ‘promoting social inclusion
and combatting poverty’ criteria.
ii.
It has become apparent how different the needs
of Cambridge are from the rest of the LEP area. Whilst Cambridge does have the
benefit of improved growth this does bring its own challenges such as the high
cost of land and homes.
iii.
With regard to the Greater Cambridge City Deal;
the government is committed, in principal, to delivering proposals on Gain
Share. The process of negotiating and agreeing a good City Deal for Greater
Cambridge are continuing and any deal will be brought back to Council for a
decision.
The committee resolved unanimously to endorse the
recommendations.
The Leader approved the recommendation.
Conflicts of Interest Declared by the Leader (and any Dispensations
Granted):
Not applicable.
Publication date: 10/02/2014
Date of decision: 20/01/2014