Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Decision details
Decision Maker: Executive Councillor for Planning, Building Control, and Infrastructure
Decision status: Recommendations Approved
Is Key decision?: No
Is subject to call in?: No
To consider the TSCSC and approve the proposed response to Cambridgeshire County Council.
Matter
for Decision:
i.
Cambridgeshire County Council is consulting on what a new Transport
Strategy for Cambridge and South Cambridgeshire (TSCSC) should look like. This
is the first step in the process and the document (Appendix B of the Officer’s
report) highlighted some of the main issues and challenges for transport in the
area, and asked what approach they should take in developing a new transport
strategy to address these issues.
ii.
The Executive
Councillor is recommended to agree the City Council’s proposed representations
to the County Council consultation on a Transport Strategy for Cambridge and
South Cambridgeshire, as set out in Appendix A.
Decision of Executive Councillor for Planning
and Sustainable Transport:
The Executive Councillor agreed the City Council’s proposed representations
to the County Council consultation on a Transport Strategy for Cambridge and
South Cambridgeshire, as set out in Appendix A of the Officer’s report and
subject to the amendments discussed below.
Reason for the Decision:
As set out in the Officer’s report.
Any Alternative Options Considered and Rejected:
Not applicable.
Scrutiny Considerations:
The Committee received a report from the Planning Policy and
Transport Officer regarding the representations relating to the Transport
Strategy for Cambridge and South Cambridgeshire. The officer tabled an
amendment sheet updated the report.
Members raised the following points:
i.
The validity
of the statistics for travel modes in other cities was questioned and members
requested details on the source of the data.
ii.
Members
suggested that the strategy lacked reference to the City of Cambridge ambitions
for reduced carbon emissions and suggested this be added to the
representations.
iii.
The strategy
was thought to be unambitious, which might be acceptable for a holding
document, but suggested that they would support a more challenging final
document.
iv.
A additional
comment supporting additional Park and Ride sites, possible located further
afield, and/or expansion of existing provision was suggested. However, this
needed to me mindful of any impact on rural bus provision.
v.
Members
requested more clarity regarding Community Bus Subsidies and how this would
work in an urban environment.
vi.
A stronger
introduction to the representations was requested to reflect the need for a
detailed transport strategy sooner rather than later. This would also need to
acknowledge infrastructure funding issues.
The Committee resolved to endorse the recommendations. The
Chair and Spokes to agree the final draft to include the above suggestions.
The Executive Councillor approved the recommendation.
Conflicts of interest declared by the Executive Councillor (and any
dispensations granted)
Not applicable.
Publication date: 18/12/2012
Date of decision: 11/09/2012