Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Decision details
Decision Maker: Leader of the Council
Decision status: Recommendations Approved
Is Key decision?: Yes
Is subject to call in?: No
To approve the draft process for responding to bids the City Council may receive under the new Community Right to Bid process in the Localism Act 2011
Matter for Decision: Using new community rights enabled under
the Localism Act 2011, local community, voluntary bodies and parish councils
will be able to identify land and buildings such as a Local shop, Local pub,
Community center, Library, Swimming pool or Playground. These can then be
nominated for inclusion on a list of assets maintained by the City Council. If
an asset on the list comes up for sale, community groups will be able to
trigger a pause for up to six months, in order to raise capital and bid to
purchase the asset before it goes on to the open market.
Decision of the Leader:
The Leader resolved
to:
i.
Note the new
requirements under the Localism Act.
ii.
Agree the
Council’s approach to this new duty as set out in the officer’s report.
iii.
Delegate
responsibility for determining whether assets are listed on the register of
assets or not to a panel of three senior officers from Property Services,
Planning and Community Development convened by the Head of Planning Services.
iv.
Bring back a
further report to the Strategy and Resources Scrutiny Committee on 15 October
2012 to agree the Council’s final approach to this duty once Regulations had
been published.
Reasons
for the Decision: As set out in the officer’s report
Any alternative options considered and
rejected: As set out in the officer’s report
Scrutiny Considerations
The committee received a report from the Head of Planning Services.
The committee made the following comments on the report:
i.
Raised concern that, as a bid would have to come from a well-established
and very well funded organisation, it may give false hope to local communities.
ii.
Highlighted the difficulty in assessing the ‘community value’ of a piece
of land or a building.
In response to member’s questions the Leader confirmed the following:
i.
Acknowledged the difficulty in assessing ‘community value’ and noted that
further guidance to ensure nationwide consistency would be beneficial.
ii.
Proposed that a further
report be brought back to the Strategy and Resources Scrutiny Committee on 15
October 2012 to agree the Council’s final approach to this duty once
Regulations had been published.
The Scrutiny
Committee considered and approved the amended recommendations by 8 votes to 0
(unanimous).
The Leader approved
the amended recommendations.
Publication date: 10/08/2012
Date of decision: 09/07/2012