Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Decision details
Decision Maker: Executive Councillor for Transformation
Decision status: Recommendations Approved
Is Key decision?: Yes
Is subject to call in?: No
· To agree revenue carry forward requests to be recommended to Council for approval.
· To seek approval from Council to rephase capital spending from 2011/12 into 2012/13.
Matter
for Decision: The officer’s report presented a summary of the 2011/12 outturn position
(actual income and expenditure) for services within the Customer Services &
Resources portfolio, compared to the final budget for the year. The position for revenue and capital
was reported and variances from budgets were highlighted, together with
explanations. Requests to carry forward funding arising from certain budget
underspends into 2012/13 were identified.
Decision of the Executive Councillor:
The Executive Councillor
resolved to:
i.
Agree that the carry
forward requests, totalling £225,430 as detailed in Appendix C of the officer’s
report, be recommended to Council for approval.
ii.
Seek approval from Council
to carry forward capital resources to fund re-phased net capital spending of
£958,000 from 2011/12 into 2012/13 and future years, as detailed in Appendix D
of the officer’s report.
Reasons for the Decision: As set out in the officer’s report
Any alternative options considered and
rejected: As set out in the
officer’s report
Scrutiny Considerations
The committee received a report from the Head of Accounting Services.
In response to member’s questions the Head of Accounting Services
confirmed the following:
i.
Further detail relating to slippage on the budget for SC192 (Development
land on the North side of Kings Hedges Road), could be requested from the
Director of Resources.
In response to member’s questions the Executive Councillor confirmed the
following:
i.
An interim
report on progress of the K1 self build project would be brought back to the Strategy
and Resources Scrutiny Committee on 15 October 2012.
In response to member’s questions the Head of ICT confirmed the
following:
i.
Slippage on
the budget for PR020 (ICT Infrastructure Programme) was related to both
hardware and software issues. The upgrade of Microsoft Office licenses had also
been delayed, as had a number of projects being delivered by Serco.
The Scrutiny
Committee considered and approved the recommendations by 4 votes to 0.
The Executive
Councillor approved the recommendations.
Publication date: 07/12/2012
Date of decision: 09/07/2012