Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Decision details
Decision Maker: Executive Councillor for Housing
Decision status: Recommendations Approved
Is Key decision?: Yes
Is subject to call in?: No
To approve the award of homelessness prevention grants (HPGs) to agencies, and to approve the repurposing of an element of the budget so that a winter provision service for rough sleepers can be commissioned over three years.
Matter for
Decision
The report detailed the annual bid round for grants
made to organisations providing homelessness
prevention services.
Decision
of Executive Councillor for Housing
i.
Approved
the award of homelessness prevention grants to voluntary and community
organisations for 2023-24, as set out in Appendix 1 of the officer’s report.
ii.
Approve
that funding from this grant programme is set aside so that a procurement
exercise can be opened for a three-year contract for winter accommodation for
rough sleepers, beginning from the winter of 2023-24.
Reason for the Decision
As set out in the
Officer’s report.
Any Alternative
Options Considered and Rejected
Not applicable.
Scrutiny
Considerations
The Committee
received a report from the Housing Services
Manager.
The Housing Services Manager said the following in response to the
Committee’s questions:
i.
There were two reasons why the grant award to
Cambridge Women’s Aid was lower compared to other organisations. The first was
that the grant funding ideally needed to focus on preventing homelessness and
the second was due to the introduction of the County wide domestic abuse
service. It was felt there could be an element of double grant funding. This
was a difficult decision to make.
ii.
The Council were fortunate as they had been able to
use reasonably priced education accommodation for homeless people during the
winter period. A longer-term accommodation solution was required, and the
council was looking at carrying out a procurement process to have a 3-year contract
with an organisation to provide such accommodation.
iii.
The length of time grant funding would cover would
be looked at as it was noted that there were benefits to providing grant
funding annually, but it also provided more certainty to organisations if funding
was guaranteed for a longer period of time (for
example over a 3-year period).
iv.
A small amount of grant funding was not allocated
at this stage so that it could be used for unforeseen events during the year.
For example, during the extremely hot weather in July 2022 some severe weather
emergency provision was required and was funded from the funding which was not
allocated.
The Committee resolved by 7 votes in favour to 0 against and 1
abstention to endorse the recommendations.
The Executive Councillor
approved the recommendations.
Conflicts of Interest
Declared by the Executive Councillor (and any Dispensations Granted)
No conflicts of interest
were declared by the Executive Councillor.
Publication date: 10/03/2023
Date of decision: 24/01/2023