Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Decision details
Decision Maker: Executive Councillor for Transformation
Decision status: Recommendations Approved
Is Key decision?: Yes
Is subject to call in?: No
The Executive Councillor is asked to recommend this report to Council, which includes the Council’s estimated Prudential and Treasury Indicators 2018/19 to 2021/22.
Matter for Decision
The Council had adopted The Chartered
Institute of Public Finance
and Accountancy (CIPFA) Code of Practice on
Treasury Management (Revised 2017).
The Code required as a minimum receipt by
full Council of an Annual Treasury Management Strategy Statement – including
the Annual Investment Strategy and Minimum Revenue Provision Policy – for the
year ahead, a half-year review report and an Annual Report (stewardship report)
covering activities in the previous year.
Decision of the Executive
Councillor for Finance and Resources
Recommend
Council to:
i.
Approve the report to
Council, which included the Council’s estimated Prudential and Treasury
Indicators 2018/19 to 2021/22.
ii.
Approve a £5m limit
on secured bonds with local businesses subject to due diligence as highlighted
in paragraph 8 of the officer’s report.
iii.
Update the Minimum
Revenue Provision (MRP) Policy to state that no MRP will be required if this
bond is secured, but this would be reviewed at least annually.
iv.
Agree the principle
of investing up to £5m in a bond issued by Allia Limited, and delegate to the
Head of Finance the final decision on the appropriateness of this investment,
once detailed due diligence has been completed as set out in paragraph 8.9 of
the Officer’s report;
v.
Increase the
counterparty limit for Barclays Bank Plc by £10m to £35m; and;
vi.
Reduce the Money
Market Fund (MMF) counterparty limit by £10m to £5m for each fund, with a total
MMF limit of £20m (and to continue using MMFs that are rated AAA).
Reason for the Decision
As set out in the Officer’s report.
Any Alternative Options Considered and
Rejected
Not applicable.
Scrutiny Considerations
The Committee received a report from the Head
of Finance. She updated the Committee with reference to paragraph 8 of the
report that investment in local bond and money market reforms there were
proposals for reducing the level of investment in these and counteract this by
investing in Barclays.
The Committee made the following comments in response to the report:
i.
Allia Limited looked
like a positive investment and asked whether there was any way to measure
community investment or benefit to Cambridge.
ii.
Saw that Allia
Limited had approached the Council, and asked whether the council could
advertise to other companies who might want to undertake this approach.
iii.
Commented that there
was a detailed opportunity with Allia Limited and asked for the advantages and
disadvantages of the two investment options.
iv.
Referred to the £5
million contained in recommendation 2.4 and queried whether this was a limit or
the scale of the investment.
The Head of Finance made the following
comments in response to Members’ questions:
i.
There was a community
benefit with the Allia Limited investment and there were ways of measuring
social value.
ii.
Each investor would
have their own investment needs this approach may not suit other investor’s
needs.
iii.
With regards to the
Allia Limited investment, the re-financing option had a slightly lower risk
compared with the redevelopment option, therefore would expect the
redevelopment option to have a higher return due to the higher risk involved.
iv.
The council would
only be looking to invest up to £5 million and therefore would not be the sole
investor as Allia was looking for twice this amount. Consideration would need
to be given to who the other investors were.
Executive
Councillor for Finance and Resources commented that Allia Limited had a record
for enabling employment, this was not a long term investment but was a 5 year
plan which he wanted to explore and fulfil.
The Committee
resolved unanimously to endorse the recommendation.
The Executive Councillor approved the
recommendation.
Conflicts of Interest
Declared by the Executive Councillor (and any Dispensations Granted)
No conflicts of interest were declared by the Executive
Councillor.
Publication date: 05/04/2019
Date of decision: 08/10/2018