Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Decision details
Decision Maker: Executive Councillor for Communities.
Decision status: Recommendations Approved
Is Key decision?: No
Is subject to call in?: No
To approve arrangements for the 2017 event.
Matter for
Decision
In March 2016 the Executive Councillor for Communities took a decision
to cancel the funfair at Midsummer Fair. In a debate on the issue at an
Extraordinary General Meeting of the Council on 26 May 2016, the Council agreed
that proposals for the 2017 event should be brought forward for discussion and approval
at the Community Services Scrutiny Committee. Cambridge Live has now considered
options for the 2017 event, discussed these with stakeholders and taken into
account their feedback. Council officers were supportive of the final
proposals.
Decision
of Executive Councillor for Communities
Agreed the arrangements proposed by Cambridge Live and supported by
officers for the Midsummer Fair 2017.
Reason for the Decision
As set out in the Officer’s report.
Any Alternative Options Considered and Rejected
Not applicable.
Scrutiny
Considerations
The Committee received a report from the Head of Community Services.
The Committee made the following comments in response to the report:
i.
The Council needed to manage residents’
expectations as it was trying to cut car usage in the city, but at the same
time was providing car parking facilities for Midsummer Fair 2017.
ii.
Blue badge holders would want to use the Fair car
park as well as Travellers.
The Head of Community Services and Cambridge Live Head of Events said
the following in response to Members’ questions:
i.
There would be one footpath closure and some
intermittent ones in the market area and car park. Intermittent closures would
be phased to avoid peak travel times.
ii.
It was inevitable that the event infrastructure
needed to manage events safely incurred costs. The City Council would discuss
these with event providers and aim to minimise these for all parties. Officers
were not in a position to give details of the final financial arrangements for
next year’s event at present, but could provide them upon request to committee
members at a later stage.
iii.
It was impracticable to not
provide a car park at the event. The car park was an important source of
revenue. Participants travelled from across the country and the car park would
be an integral part of the event.
iv.
The car parking plan for the event was
the same as in previous years.
The Committee resolved by 6 votes to 0 to endorse the
recommendation.
The Executive Councillor
approved the recommendation.
Conflicts of Interest Declared by the Executive Councillor
(and any Dispensations Granted)
No conflicts of interest
were declared by the Executive Councillor.
Publication date: 26/10/2016
Date of decision: 06/10/2016