Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Decision details
Decision Maker: Executive Councillor for Housing
Decision status: Recommendations Approved
Is Key decision?: No
Is subject to call in?: No
To note the updated review of the Council’s social lettings agency (Town
Hall Lettings) along with the following:
1)
The
proposed role for the social lettings agency in managing the intermediate
market.
2)
The
social lettings agency business plan.
3)
Report
on outcomes to date.
Matter for
Decision
The Council had been piloting a social lettings (Town Hall Lettings) agency for two years. The report built on the
report presented to Housing Scrutiny Committee in March 2015 and aimed to
inform Members of the proposed direction of travel for Town Hall Lettings beyond April 2016. The report detailed the
outcomes delivered by the social lettings agency to date, covered the proposed
role for THL in managing the intermediate market and outlined the business plan
moving forward.
Decision
of Executive Councillor for Housing
i.
Noted that the proposed role for Town
Hall Lettings in managing the ‘intermediate market’ properties as set out
in the officer’s report and appendix 1
ii.
Noted the 5 year business plan for Town
Hall Lettings as detailed in appendix 1
Reason for the Decision
As set out in the Officer’s report.
Any Alternative Options Considered and Rejected
Not applicable.
Scrutiny
Considerations
The Committee received a report from the Housing Advice Service Manager
regarding the Social Lettings Agency Model.
Members questioned the 7 year subsidy included in the plan and asked if
this had been a factored in to the pilot projections.
The Housing Advice Service manager stated that:
i.
An assumption of tenant turnover in the first three years was in line
with the experience of the private sector and had little financial impact on
the project.
ii.
Tenant deposits would be held in line with the legal requirements of
letting arrangements.
iii.
Agency fees of 2 to 3% were considerable less that
high street agencies that typically charged 10 to 11%.
The Committee resolved unanimously to endorse the recommendation.
The Executive Councillor
approved the recommendation.
Publication date: 22/02/2016
Date of decision: 13/01/2016