Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Decision details
Decision Maker: Planning
Decision status: Recommendations Approved
Is Key decision?: No
Is subject to call in?: No
The Committee received an application for
full planning permission.
The application sought approval for a two storey one bed room unit (residential studio) on land to the
rear.
The Planning
Officer circulated colour photos of the site showing various building
elevations.
The Principal
Planning Officer revised the recommendation for refusal to include a specific
reference that the design did not respond to the character of the area.
The Committee:
Resolved
(by 5 votes to 1) to refuse the application for planning permission in accordance with
the officer recommendation for the following reason:
The proposed
studio flat, due to the infilling of the gap, erosion of view of the rear of
the terraces and its scale, form, design and fenestration - which would be
highly visible in the street - would result in a form of development that would
be visually and cumulatively detrimental to the character and appearance of the
Conservation Area. In addition, the development would lead to pressure to prune
or fell the Birch tree at the front of the site, which would erode and be of
detriment to the character and appearance of the Conservation Area, given that
the tree plays an important role within the street. For these reasons, the
development would be contrary to policies 3/4, 3/7, 3/10, 3/11, 3/12, 4/4 and
4/11 of the adopted Cambridge Local Plan (2006).
Report author: Amit Patel
Publication date: 25/09/2015
Date of decision: 02/09/2015
Decided at meeting: 02/09/2015 - Planning
Accompanying Documents: