Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Decision details
Decision Maker: Leader of the Council
Decision status: Recommendations Approved
Is Key decision?: Yes
Is subject to call in?: No
Approve Increasing counterparty limits, additional use of financial instruments, estimated Prudential and Treasury Indicators.
Matter
for Decision
The
Council is required by regulations issued under the Local Government Act 2003, to
produce an annual strategy treasury report reviewing treasury management
activities.
Decision of the Leader of the Council
Resolved to:
i.
Recommend to
Council changes to counterparty limits as set out below (detailed in section 6
and Appendix A of the Officer’s report):
a) Increase current single counterparty limits from £10m
to £15m
b) Increase the counterparty group limit from £15m to
£22.5m (1.5 times single counterparty limit)
c) Increase HSBC Deposit Account limit by £4m to £20m
d) Apply a single counterparty Certificates of Deposit
limit of £10m; and
e) Apply a Money Market Fund limit of £10m per fund
ii.
Recommend
to Council changes to the estimated Prudential & Treasury Indicators for
2013/14 to 2016/17, inclusive, as set out in Appendix E of the Officer’s
report.
Reasons for the
Decision
As set out in the Officer’s report
Any Alternative Options Considered and
Rejected
Not applicable.
Scrutiny
Considerations
The committee received a report from the Director of Resources regarding
the Treasury Management Strategy Report 2013/14 to 2016/17.
In response to member’s questions the Director of Resources confirmed
the following:
i.
In the current financial climate it was important
for the Council to take a cautious approach to treasury management.
ii.
Explained the difference between Certificates of
Deposits and Money Market Funds.
iii.
Agreed to provide further detail to members
regarding Appendix C of the Officer’s report and where claims against LBI would
feature.
iv.
The Council moved their funds effectively between
banks in order to ensure the best rates.
v.
A standardised credit rating system across all
local authorities ensured a robust approach to identifying risk.
vi.
Whilst increased levels of deposits would ensure
greater flexibility for the Council, the instruments had only been used between
£8m and £10m in the last financial year.
As the instruments had not been used, and they wouldn’t have been used
above the £10m limit even if they were available, the Chair proposed the
following amendments to recommendation d) and e) of the Officer’s report
(replacement underlined and original struck through):
e) Apply a single counterparty Certificates of Deposit
limit of £10m £15m and
f) Apply a Money Market Fund limit of £10m £15m
per fund
The committee resolved by 4 votes to 0 to agree the amendments.
The Committee
resolved unanimously to endorse the amended recommendations.
The Leader of the Council approved the amended
recommendations.
Conflicts of Interest Declared by the Leader of the Council (and any
Dispensations Granted)
Not applicable.
Publication date: 31/10/2013
Date of decision: 14/10/2013