A Cambridge City Council website

Cambridge City Council

Council and democracy

Home > Council and Democracy > Decision details

Decision details

Cambridge 20mph Project – Phase 1 Consultation Report

Decision Maker: Executive Councillor for Planning, Building Control, and Infrastructure

Decision status: Recommendations Approved

Is Key decision?: Yes

Is subject to call in?: No

Purpose:

To agree on progressing Phase 1 (North Area) to statutory process and implementation. Also to agree commencement of consultation for Phase 2 (East Area).

Decision:

Matter for Decision

To provide infrastructure (signs and lines) for a new 20 mph speed limit on the public highway in the north area of the city, and to undertake public consultation activities for a proposed similar limit in the east area of the city. The new 20mph infrastructure would include repeater signs mounted on existing lamp columns, and white coloured 20 mph roundel road markings. Entry into new 20mph limits would be via entry points highlighted by larger 20mph terminal signs, roundel road markings and on more main roads, patches of coloured road surface material.

 

Decision of Executive Councillor for Planning and Climate Change

Financial recommendation

       i.          Approved the commencement of phase 1 of this scheme, which is already included in the Council’s Capital & Revenue Project Plan. The total cost of phase 1 is £158,700 funded from the 20mph project capital allocation SC532.

 

Procurement recommendations 

     ii.          Approved the carrying out and completion of the procurement of:

·       Phase 1 Safety Audit - £4000.

·       Phase 1 traffic order making process including street notices - £8000.

·       Implementation of Phase 1 (in line with the roads recommended for inclusion by North Area Committee on 01/08/13, see list below) - £131,500.

·       Phase 1 post implementation automatic traffic count (ATC) monitoring - £3,700.

·       Phase 2 pre-consultation ATC monitoring - £3,500.

·       Phase 2 consultation and public engagement including exhibitions - £8,000.

   iii.          Subject to:

·       The permission of the Director of Resources being sought prior to proceeding if the quotation or tender sum exceeds the estimated contract.

·       The permission from the Executive Councillor being sought before proceeding if the value exceeds the estimated contract by more than 15%.

 

Recommendations from North Area Committee

   iv.          Inclusion of all unclassified roads in the north phase area.

    v.          Inclusion of the following C class roads: Chesterton High Street, Green End Road, Arbury Road.

   vi.          Exclusion of the following C class roads: Kings Hedges Road, Gilbert Road - For the provision of 20mph on Victoria Road (an A class road) to be investigated and progressed.

 

Reason for the Decision

As set out in the Officer’s report.

 

Any Alternative Options Considered and Rejected

Not applicable.

 

Scrutiny Considerations

The Committee received a report from the Cambridge 20 mph Project Officer.

 

In response to Members’ questions the Cambridge 20 mph Project Officer said the following:

 

       i.          Cost figures in the report were estimates. These could be revised once quotes on actual costs were received. It was anticipated that cost estimates were higher in the report than the final figures would be.

     ii.          The north area was likely to be the most expensive phase of the project.

   iii.          City and County Officers regularly liaised about the 20 mph project. The County Council were the Highways Authority, so the project would have to go to Cabinet to start the statutory process in October 2013.

   iv.          The Cambridge 20 mph Project Officer had liaised with Brighton & Hove Officers to learn from their experience. He would also liaise with Islington BC officers at Councillor Tunnicliffe’s suggestion.

 

The Committee unanimously resolved to endorse the recommendations.

 

The Executive Councillor approved the recommendations.

 

Conflicts of Interest Declared by the Executive Councillor (and any Dispensations Granted)

No conflicts of interest were declared by the Executive Councillor.

Publication date: 29/10/2013

Date of decision: 08/10/2013